It’s amazing how words written hundreds of years ago still have relevance today. Shakespeare might have been writing about ASR.
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy"
Take it on faith: A cease-and-desist letter to those who only believe in measurements
Faith is a firm belief in something for which there is no proof (https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/faith). Faith is often considered to be distinct from and even contrary to science. I argue science is based on faith. Specifically, it is faith in the belief that measurements are always correct, and they alone can reveal the world around us. However, there is no evidence that this approach will always provide a correct and complete depiction of our environment.
I am not anti-science. In fact, I am all about science. I was a science major in college. I taught high school biology and chemistry. I employ science every day in my current career. I also use it to make decisions when it comes to audio, and I can point to a scientific basis behind my equipment decisions, speaker/listener locations and room treatment. I believe John Locke’s scientific method is a wonderful boon to mankind. But although data may rule my life, I know that science has its limitations.
The scientific method is an empirical approach and relies on our eight senses or extensions thereof to measure phenomena, enabling us to better understand and control our environment. People who embrace this approach believe if something cannot be measured, it cannot exist. They have total faith in this approach and deny the credibility of others whose senses do not or cannot yield something in units. In essence, these disciples take it on faith that measurements are the only true way to make sense of the world. However, we just may not have developed the instrument that enables us to measure the event. Early digital is a good example of our senses superseding the limitations of our understanding of the technology and hence, our measurements. Other examples of this include our past beliefs that we could destroy mass, that the earth is flat, and the universe is not expanding. And cables and amplifiers all sound the same.
Others find their senses can reveal events that are not apparent to some and may not even be measurable. Some people can smell faint odors or feel a slight breeze that others cannot. My wife can find a Petoskey stone on a beach out of thousands of rocks; I cannot see it even when I am standing over it. Different cables, fuses, amplifier topology, or cartridge design may or may not result in the same or even any data points and may or may not sound alike. But just because you cannot hear a difference nor measure a difference does not mean there is no difference. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, just as good sound may be in their ear.
Some of us have at least as much faith in our ears as we do in our REW software and associated hardware. I start room setup with acoustic theory and then confirm with measurements, but the final placement is always a result of what sounds most pleasing. I would not know how to determine speaker toe-in using a microphone.
While I will always have to trust my senses, I am not handicapped by relying solely on those that are associated with a number.
“…not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted.” William Bruce Cameron, 1963
What a doozey of a statement! Did they think that current did not exist before they could measure it? I think the new tonearm by Wilson Benesch is a classic example of how science and measurement proceed. The previous tonearm was designed in the belief that unwanted vibrations should be channeled away from the stylus, and the designers did their best to achieve this outcome. Then measurement technology caught up, allowing micro-vibrations to be measured (at an Italian University) and the new arm was designed in part using AI. It turns out that the old arm was very good at suppressing vibrations, but the new one is even better. It uses a carbon fibre tube, expanding like a parabola, where the carbon fibre spirals around the tube. It then meets a titanium structure resembling the lightweight bone of a bird's limb before emerging as a counterweight filled with powdered titanium. |
"All that exist can be measured, it can be measured today or someday, If it cannot be measured in any way anytime it cannot ever exist." -- Anonymus objectivist
The problem is the rainbow exist but only for a subjective eyes/brain. The sound quality experience exist for subjective ears/brain... Even if they are never measured...What can be measured here, is not the colors experience or the sound quality experience as such but some of their correlative objective parameters.
|
Gonna have to side with OP @tcutter on this one. If you guys are too short-sighted to see that science of yesterday was replaced with the science of today, you may want to look up the word humility in the dictionary. That's the best part about science. It can be replaced with something that proves it is outdated or incomplete. This isn't a fallacy. What the OP said is irrefutable in my eyes. That's not to say that current science hasn't given us most of what we enjoy as modern comforts today. Nor should we throw out the scientific method when it doesn't fit our preconceived notions. I think the subtle point here is, we need to be aware that science/measurements are still based on a humanized incomplete view on reality. And unless we understand the system as a whole, we must admit that our current understanding is just that. Current understanding. That's why it's called the "Theory of x" - because it's based on our current well researched understanding of things - not because it is irrefutable. |