From what I learned over long years - it is the way we born. Generally, there are two groups: one likes "bright" sound and one likes "warm" sound. The bright group is not very vocal and the warm group is very vocal about displeasures. Let’s say we have same size surface area for frequency receptors. The bright group usually could not hear high frequencies > 13kHz and the worm group can hear well above. But what it means? I think the bright group has more receptors for mid and bass (sensitive) and lacks receptors for > 13 kHz (not as sensitive). The warm group has more area dedicated for high frequencies (very sensitive), but lacks some receptors for mids and bass (less sensitive). So bright group always trying to cut mid and bump highs and warm group is trying to bump mids and cut highs. There is not much going on above 13kHz in the music, but I guess whatever warm group could hear - it is not very pleasant (unless you are a bat). I am in the bright group. Just my 2c.
PS: And yes, the "warmth" distortion would generally "dissolve" high frequencies.
If Warmth Is a Distortion, Why Do So Many Audiophiles Still Defend It?
Hi everyone, this is my first post here. If it stirs some emotions — that’s not a bad thing. It means we’re all still passionate about this hobby.
As AI becomes capable of recreating any sound signature — warm, tube-like, analogue, ultra-wide, hyper-detailed, and everything in between — I’m starting to think the real future of audio lies in neutral, transparent, dynamic, and accurate hardware, while many of the “flavours” we chase may soon become software choices.
Over time, a few things have stood out to me:
• Warmth is pleasant, but it’s still coloration.
Beautiful, yes — but not accuracy, not transparency, and not always the artist’s intention.
• Warm gear enhances some tracks but softens accuracy in others.
Especially vocals, piano, violin, guitar, and other acoustic instruments. Some people hear this, some don’t, and some just prefer it that way.
• Modern Class D deserves more respect than it gets.
Many older audiophiles dismiss it based on outdated assumptions. But the latest designs are already extremely neutral, fast, and precise. I’m not sure how much longer Class A/AB will remain relevant beyond nostalgia and brand loyalty.
• Price reflects real quality only up to a point.
Beyond that, it becomes about branding, house sound, and personal bias. Preference is fine — but preference isn’t the same as absolute fidelity.
---
⭐ Why I May Not Respond Immediately
This post is meant as a sharing of thoughts, not a debate I plan to defend point by point.
If I don’t reply right away, it’s because I’m taking time to read, think, and learn from others’ perspectives here.
Posting in good faith — looking forward to all views, supportive or critical.
- ...
- 205 posts total
- 205 posts total

