It is not me who circle around himself...
I spoke after listening your system/room...
I dont doubt that your gear design is good...
Your recording demonstrated that the room where you did these recording nevermind your very good gear design ask for more optimization...
My point is acoustics matter as much the other half : gear design ...
A factor you forgot asking others to evaluate your system...
My system was way less refined than yours, especially my past Mission Cyrus speakers compared to yours in my first controlled room, but so imperfect it was i prefer it to yours, now why ?
You put good or superior gear designed system in an ordinary room ignoring or forgetting that room controls matter as much as your gear design......
This is my point...
@mahgister We have now started going around in circles and it is just not getting through to you that the net cumulative result of the contributions is the resultant sound. You could have a perfectly acoustically controlled room and optimal psychoacoustics parameters and yet yield an inferior resultant sound than what others have achieved without addressing the room acoustics. How is that possible you ask? Because the resultant sound is based on all the contributors and for example in the case of one of examples that I shared at the beginning of this threat where the system has a frequency extension of 8-12KHz it will never yield resolution, low & inner detail, as you will hear from a more cable system, no matter how optimized the room acoustics and psychoacoustics parameters are.

