@knownothing how do you explain that I’m able to achieve great sound on my audio recordings of my systems shared on YouTube and you cannot achieve even good audio quality on your system’s audio recordings? What do you think accounts for those differences? Could those differences some how be indicative in the differences in the actual sound qualities of our systems? I know the answer but curious to hear what you think.
Striking a balance between musicality and resolution
As my years and experience in this hobby continue to grow I notice a divergence between those seeking extreme resolution and detail from their music reproduction systems and those in search of maximum musicality.
In theory, high-end audio systems should provide more than garden variety stereo systems. In my view that means more detail and information should be heard from a high-end music reproduction system than one hears from ordinary HiFi stereo systems set ups. BUT is there such thing as too much resolution and detail in a stereo system’s sound presentation?
Some people feel that a less detailed presentation that is easier for your brain to process has better flow and provides more enjoyable listening.
So there is the dichotomy. Should one pay more to hear less? Can a frequency response performance that is curtailed at both frequency extremes be desired and praised?
Those that seek a “more musical” presentation usually point to their belief that that is how they hear live un-amplified acoustic music in the real world. In nature, high frequencies attenuate and decay with distance from the source and sound waves get absorbed, diffracted, reflected, and diffused by the environmental factors and landscapes; so they are not wrong in stating that in the real world the sound of music is less detailed and extended. The issue is that when we listen to our music reproduction systems at home we are not listening to live un-amplified music in a concert venue, but rather professionally produced audio recordings typically recorded with close-microphones techniques.
So the question is, do we want our systems to reproduce the sound on the commercial audio recordings accurately or does one want hear the sound the way one thinks that it should sound?
Lucky for me, I have enough systems at home that I have been able to design, set up, and tune them for different targeted resultant sound, sound presentation, and sound qualities. For instance, my OKTAN6 ultimate horn system is a dissecting microscope, my Pinnacle horn system aims at extreme musicality, and my WAAR reference system is a chameleon, which can be adjusted to sound exactly how you want it to sound in real-time.
My “test-bed” system takes on the sound character and sound qualities of the components in use and it is excellent for evaluating what new components have to offer or bring to the table in terms of sound qualities. But with the Acapella TW-1S ION plasma super-tweeters extending the high frequencies, the TBI Emperor subwoofers extending the low frequencies, and the highly detailed & nuanced Digital Audio Denmark AX24 DSD dac streaming HQPLAYER as the source, the “Test Bed” system is a highly resolving system.
As with everything else in life, is there a happy medium or compromise that gives you the best of those worlds? I believe that there is and that great music reproduction systems can be tuned to strike a balance between musicality and resolution. If one listens to the evolution of my OKTAN6 ultimate horn system for instance you can hear that the fine tuning is driving the sound in that direction.
So during last night’s listening session I adjusted the sound of my “Test Bed” system to a more musical sound presentation. The “Test Bed” system is always in flux so it allows me to experiment, explore, tweak, tune, and have fun with it.
Here is an audio recording from last night’s listening session that captures the revised sound presentation and conveys the sound qualities that exemplify a more organic sound versus a more delineated & resolved sound presentation:
- ...
- 512 posts total
It is not me who circle around himself... I spoke after listening your system/room... I dont doubt that your gear design is good... Your recording demonstrated that the room where you did these recording nevermind your very good gear design ask for more optimization... My point is acoustics matter as much the other half : gear design ... A factor you forgot asking others to evaluate your system...
My system was way less refined than yours, especially my past Mission Cyrus speakers compared to yours in my first controlled room, but so imperfect it was i prefer it to yours, now why ? You put good or superior gear designed system in an ordinary room ignoring or forgetting that room controls matter as much as your gear design...... This is my point...
|
7 pages of you all all taking the bait on this guy's foolish attempts at a flex through youtube videos...
|
@deep_333 You still have not provided the audio recording of the Strapping Young Lads played through your system. It is funny how you think that I’m “flexing”, I’ll interpret that you must be impressed if posting casually recorded audio recordings of a few of my systems is perceived as “flexing”. This is an audio forum and we are here to speak about and discuss our systems. Not a flex, just reality. |
It's as mahgister said. Though the system sounds good, he also hears the room and it is leaving its "impression" on the resultant sound at the seat. Because I am unfamiliar with your recordings, I don't know off-hand where to find the YouTube line feed so I can get a better idea as to how much is the room/system and how much is the actual recording, but it has the characteristic sound of reflections associated with an untreated room and the sound permeates the various recordings giving them a similarity in "ambience." |
- 512 posts total

