Striking a balance between musicality and resolution


As my years and experience in this hobby continue to grow I notice a divergence between those seeking extreme resolution and detail from their music reproduction systems and those in search of maximum musicality.

In theory, high-end audio systems should provide more than garden variety stereo systems. In my view that means more detail and information should be heard from a high-end music reproduction system than one hears from ordinary HiFi stereo systems set ups. BUT is there such thing as too much resolution and detail in a stereo system’s sound presentation?

Some people feel that a less detailed presentation that is easier for your brain to process has better flow and provides more enjoyable listening.

So there is the dichotomy. Should one pay more to hear less? Can a frequency response performance that is curtailed at both frequency extremes be desired and praised?

Those that seek a “more musical” presentation usually point to their belief that that is how they hear live un-amplified acoustic music in the real world. In nature, high frequencies attenuate and decay with distance from the source and sound waves get absorbed, diffracted, reflected, and diffused by the environmental factors and landscapes; so they are not wrong in stating that in the real world the sound of music is less detailed and extended. The issue is that when we listen to our music reproduction systems at home we are not listening to live un-amplified music in a concert venue, but rather professionally produced audio recordings typically recorded with close-microphones techniques.

So the question is, do we want our systems to reproduce the sound on the commercial audio recordings accurately or does one want hear the sound the way one thinks that it should sound?

Lucky for me, I have enough systems at home that I have been able to design, set up, and tune them for different targeted resultant sound, sound presentation, and sound qualities. For instance, my OKTAN6 ultimate horn system is a dissecting microscope, my Pinnacle horn system aims at extreme musicality, and my WAAR reference system is a chameleon, which can be adjusted to sound exactly how you want it to sound in real-time.

My “test-bed” system takes on the sound character and sound qualities of the components in use and it is excellent for evaluating what new components have to offer or bring to the table in terms of sound qualities. But with the Acapella TW-1S ION plasma super-tweeters extending the high frequencies, the TBI Emperor subwoofers extending the low frequencies, and the highly detailed & nuanced Digital Audio Denmark AX24 DSD dac streaming HQPLAYER as the source, the “Test Bed” system is a highly resolving system.

As with everything else in life, is there a happy medium or compromise that gives you the best of those worlds? I believe that there is and that great music reproduction systems can be tuned to strike a balance between musicality and resolution. If one listens to the evolution of my OKTAN6 ultimate horn system for instance you can hear that the fine tuning is driving the sound in that direction.

So during last night’s listening session I adjusted the sound of my “Test Bed” system to a more musical sound presentation. The “Test Bed” system is always in flux so it allows me to experiment, explore, tweak, tune, and have fun with it.

Here is an audio recording from last night’s listening session that captures the revised sound presentation and conveys the sound qualities that exemplify a more organic sound versus a more delineated & resolved sound presentation:
 

The Way It Goes

 

carlos269

We cannot understand what we do when we improve our system/room if we are not guided by acoustics and psycho-acoustics concepts and experiments...

But it seems it is Chinese for some...

I designed my system not for my "taste" or with only my "taste" but with basic knowledge..

 Learning more it improve more...

Where is my taste when i learn how to hear sounds parameters and concepts ?

My Taste about what ?

Nobody taste a too echoic room or a too damped room...

Nobody taste a system not well served  by the acoustic content of the room ...

 We can play with the gear design...But it is not enough to create an acoustic immersive experience. We must tailor made the different ratios implied by acoustics parameters for a specific system...

Acoustics at the end rules our taste by educating our hearing...

It is the same for music. i did not stay all my life with my tastes i educated them and they changes with more exposition to music..

Only a child claim : it is  "my taste"...

smiley

I trust atmasphere from the day he spoke about the link of his design with psycho-acoustics..

I dont trust  many ASR members because they spoke only about some specs measures not about the system in specific acoustics condition correlated with their specs...

I dont trust my "taste" for ever, it is a mere starting point ,  i train myself..

 

 

Post removed 

@mahgister That was an interesting post. You state that you don’t trust your “taste”, which is how it sounds, and you don’t trust measurements, and you rely strictly on knowledge. What feedback mechanism do you use to ensure that your knowledge is correctly applied if you don’t use the sound or the measurements. If by “taste” you don’t mean sound corrected, then what sound are you desiring or targeting that isn’t a “taste”? If your answer is “what it should be”, the what should it be? And how do know that?

@rauliruegas whatever “dust” from my subs makes it to the midrange and treble is part of the composite sound that makes up the resultant sound. Sorry to tell you that I don’t know and I don’t care about that contribution as the only thing that I care and focus on is the resultant composite sound at the listening chair position. The individual contributions are for people like you to worry about, I stopped chasing my tail a long time ago.

... you're fooling yourself if you think that what you do is better but I am sure that you make the 'sound' more to your liking ...

And that's fine because there's no need to justify a preference. But arguing YouTube as a useful audio diagnostic tool is just silly.