Striking a balance between musicality and resolution


As my years and experience in this hobby continue to grow I notice a divergence between those seeking extreme resolution and detail from their music reproduction systems and those in search of maximum musicality.

In theory, high-end audio systems should provide more than garden variety stereo systems. In my view that means more detail and information should be heard from a high-end music reproduction system than one hears from ordinary HiFi stereo systems set ups. BUT is there such thing as too much resolution and detail in a stereo system’s sound presentation?

Some people feel that a less detailed presentation that is easier for your brain to process has better flow and provides more enjoyable listening.

So there is the dichotomy. Should one pay more to hear less? Can a frequency response performance that is curtailed at both frequency extremes be desired and praised?

Those that seek a “more musical” presentation usually point to their belief that that is how they hear live un-amplified acoustic music in the real world. In nature, high frequencies attenuate and decay with distance from the source and sound waves get absorbed, diffracted, reflected, and diffused by the environmental factors and landscapes; so they are not wrong in stating that in the real world the sound of music is less detailed and extended. The issue is that when we listen to our music reproduction systems at home we are not listening to live un-amplified music in a concert venue, but rather professionally produced audio recordings typically recorded with close-microphones techniques.

So the question is, do we want our systems to reproduce the sound on the commercial audio recordings accurately or does one want hear the sound the way one thinks that it should sound?

Lucky for me, I have enough systems at home that I have been able to design, set up, and tune them for different targeted resultant sound, sound presentation, and sound qualities. For instance, my OKTAN6 ultimate horn system is a dissecting microscope, my Pinnacle horn system aims at extreme musicality, and my WAAR reference system is a chameleon, which can be adjusted to sound exactly how you want it to sound in real-time.

My “test-bed” system takes on the sound character and sound qualities of the components in use and it is excellent for evaluating what new components have to offer or bring to the table in terms of sound qualities. But with the Acapella TW-1S ION plasma super-tweeters extending the high frequencies, the TBI Emperor subwoofers extending the low frequencies, and the highly detailed & nuanced Digital Audio Denmark AX24 DSD dac streaming HQPLAYER as the source, the “Test Bed” system is a highly resolving system.

As with everything else in life, is there a happy medium or compromise that gives you the best of those worlds? I believe that there is and that great music reproduction systems can be tuned to strike a balance between musicality and resolution. If one listens to the evolution of my OKTAN6 ultimate horn system for instance you can hear that the fine tuning is driving the sound in that direction.

So during last night’s listening session I adjusted the sound of my “Test Bed” system to a more musical sound presentation. The “Test Bed” system is always in flux so it allows me to experiment, explore, tweak, tune, and have fun with it.

Here is an audio recording from last night’s listening session that captures the revised sound presentation and conveys the sound qualities that exemplify a more organic sound versus a more delineated & resolved sound presentation:
 

The Way It Goes

 

carlos269

 Why are you so sure that your system is so impressive ?

I understand that most system are not even good. Yours seem acceptable at most because you had no control over your room acoustics anyway, generally  we  cannot judge  system/room immersiveness from a mic take on youtube, we perceive  in this case more easily defects than quality with a mic recording from youtube ...

it is possible though in some exceptional case ...

Once i listened a long time ago though  to a Japanese or Chinese audiophile  a recording from his dedicated room and it was stunning ..I tried to retrieve it and posted it here, i could not..,.

Then you are right it is possible in some case to have a recording of our room...

But in general it is not good because people have no controlled room anyway ...

They think the sound come from their speakers...smiley

Even in nearfield it come also from the room if the room is relatively small it is evident ...

 

 

«Speakers are two brain hemisphere waiting for their dreamed room body» -- Anonymus acoustician 

 

Why is it that only myself and @mihorn have actually shared audio recordings of our systems on this thread? Has anyone else achieved anything of distinction that care to share and showcase their achievement?

 

My goal has always been to hear what the artists recorded. I only have one system, so it has to be as neutral as possible.

Here is another well balanced AND enjoyable audio recording of my Test Bed system from last weekend’s listening session:

The One I Love

 

This video is very basic and will not teach the power of a grid of resonators distributed at critical spot but it is basic acoustics explained and why it matter as much if not more than the gear...

it is easy to buy good gear...

It is harder to control a room to serve a specific system : 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M_Kck6RmXEc&t=356s

 

now the acoustics basic lesson go on :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTgW2hZYn08

 

Now imagine what  100 tuned resonators wisely distributed can do ?

answer : total immersiveness...

 

 Acoustics rules audio not gear price tag ...

 

@mahgister:  in that pictures of your system was you who   used the word resonator.

Never mind, yes I'm still laughin. Sorry to disturb you. Eough.

R.