@toddalin If readily available, could you show the imp./phase angle vs freq. plot and SPL. Thx.
Striking a balance between musicality and resolution
As my years and experience in this hobby continue to grow I notice a divergence between those seeking extreme resolution and detail from their music reproduction systems and those in search of maximum musicality.
In theory, high-end audio systems should provide more than garden variety stereo systems. In my view that means more detail and information should be heard from a high-end music reproduction system than one hears from ordinary HiFi stereo systems set ups. BUT is there such thing as too much resolution and detail in a stereo system’s sound presentation?
Some people feel that a less detailed presentation that is easier for your brain to process has better flow and provides more enjoyable listening.
So there is the dichotomy. Should one pay more to hear less? Can a frequency response performance that is curtailed at both frequency extremes be desired and praised?
Those that seek a “more musical” presentation usually point to their belief that that is how they hear live un-amplified acoustic music in the real world. In nature, high frequencies attenuate and decay with distance from the source and sound waves get absorbed, diffracted, reflected, and diffused by the environmental factors and landscapes; so they are not wrong in stating that in the real world the sound of music is less detailed and extended. The issue is that when we listen to our music reproduction systems at home we are not listening to live un-amplified music in a concert venue, but rather professionally produced audio recordings typically recorded with close-microphones techniques.
So the question is, do we want our systems to reproduce the sound on the commercial audio recordings accurately or does one want hear the sound the way one thinks that it should sound?
Lucky for me, I have enough systems at home that I have been able to design, set up, and tune them for different targeted resultant sound, sound presentation, and sound qualities. For instance, my OKTAN6 ultimate horn system is a dissecting microscope, my Pinnacle horn system aims at extreme musicality, and my WAAR reference system is a chameleon, which can be adjusted to sound exactly how you want it to sound in real-time.
My “test-bed” system takes on the sound character and sound qualities of the components in use and it is excellent for evaluating what new components have to offer or bring to the table in terms of sound qualities. But with the Acapella TW-1S ION plasma super-tweeters extending the high frequencies, the TBI Emperor subwoofers extending the low frequencies, and the highly detailed & nuanced Digital Audio Denmark AX24 DSD dac streaming HQPLAYER as the source, the “Test Bed” system is a highly resolving system.
As with everything else in life, is there a happy medium or compromise that gives you the best of those worlds? I believe that there is and that great music reproduction systems can be tuned to strike a balance between musicality and resolution. If one listens to the evolution of my OKTAN6 ultimate horn system for instance you can hear that the fine tuning is driving the sound in that direction.
So during last night’s listening session I adjusted the sound of my “Test Bed” system to a more musical sound presentation. The “Test Bed” system is always in flux so it allows me to experiment, explore, tweak, tune, and have fun with it.
Here is an audio recording from last night’s listening session that captures the revised sound presentation and conveys the sound qualities that exemplify a more organic sound versus a more delineated & resolved sound presentation:
- ...
- 512 posts total
Hi, how did you arrive at so many capacitors and resistors of nearly the same values in parallel? I can understand bypass caps, but unless I'm totally missing something that's not the implementation. In your circuit, in a few locations, several caps in parallel can be replaced by a single one of the calculated value for parallel (or series) passive components. What am I missing? |
@kevemaher you bark the wrong tree. @toddalin is the proud author. And he should be proud if everything works out well from a seemingly complex (not complicated) circuitry. I thus asked for the imp. and freq. charts. |
Ad hominem attack remind me of children in yard... You never had seen my tuned resonators grid ( 100 different one) because i never posted it here .. Then you lie or hallucinate.. Guess why i never posted any photo of my homemade grid ?. Also anybody could read about Helmholtz resonators it is in all applied acoustics books.. If you dont try to experiment with them and their location, at least with a few you cannot understand basic room acoustics... ( room acoustic is not just about reflections,diffusion and absorption panels it is about mechanical crossfeed for our ears too etc )
I dont teach anything i speak about basic acoustics...(use of the lateral reflections for example to create immersiveness etc ) Resonators are basic. Go on laughing, it is good for health...
|
Why is it that only myself and @mihorn have actually shared audio recordings of our systems on this thread? Has anyone else achieved anything of distinction that they care to share to showcase their achievement? @atmasphere Try spending some time at Sterling Sound studio. I spent time at the old Sony Classical Music studio in NYC and can tell tell you the mastering engineers work to a target sound just like I do. You can not even begin to imagine the power and capabilities of HQPLAYER, but it is just a tool, which means that it does nothing without knowledge and creativity. It is only as powerful as your mind allows it to be. |
- 512 posts total

