Great post!
To evaluate any system we must be in the room...
Acoustics and psycho-acoustics matter ...
From the live event, to the perspective trade-off recording and mixing choices, to our specific controlled or uncontrolled speakers/room, to our ears/ brain biases and acoustic parameters, we have many acoustic "translation" and trade-off ...No absolute truth...
The fact that you have the audacity to believe that you can possibly have a clue as to what I wanted something to sound like or rather I was actually successful in achieving that goal. Or that you can determine what is the closet approximation of what it actually ended up sounding like, in the environment that it was mixed and/or mastered, is disillusion to the point of grandeur. I could elaborate for ten pages of why that is absolutely absurd. But, I don’t have the time nor would you listen. You have developed a system for measuring accuracy out of your own ignorance of what exactly exists in the real world, or the resources, compromises, and conditions under which they occur. I could expand on any one of these points for pages. The idea that you can record a sound system, post it on Youtube, and have it reflect the actual performance of said system is a joke without a punchline.

