Striking a balance between musicality and resolution


As my years and experience in this hobby continue to grow I notice a divergence between those seeking extreme resolution and detail from their music reproduction systems and those in search of maximum musicality.

In theory, high-end audio systems should provide more than garden variety stereo systems. In my view that means more detail and information should be heard from a high-end music reproduction system than one hears from ordinary HiFi stereo systems set ups. BUT is there such thing as too much resolution and detail in a stereo system’s sound presentation?

Some people feel that a less detailed presentation that is easier for your brain to process has better flow and provides more enjoyable listening.

So there is the dichotomy. Should one pay more to hear less? Can a frequency response performance that is curtailed at both frequency extremes be desired and praised?

Those that seek a “more musical” presentation usually point to their belief that that is how they hear live un-amplified acoustic music in the real world. In nature, high frequencies attenuate and decay with distance from the source and sound waves get absorbed, diffracted, reflected, and diffused by the environmental factors and landscapes; so they are not wrong in stating that in the real world the sound of music is less detailed and extended. The issue is that when we listen to our music reproduction systems at home we are not listening to live un-amplified music in a concert venue, but rather professionally produced audio recordings typically recorded with close-microphones techniques.

So the question is, do we want our systems to reproduce the sound on the commercial audio recordings accurately or does one want hear the sound the way one thinks that it should sound?

Lucky for me, I have enough systems at home that I have been able to design, set up, and tune them for different targeted resultant sound, sound presentation, and sound qualities. For instance, my OKTAN6 ultimate horn system is a dissecting microscope, my Pinnacle horn system aims at extreme musicality, and my WAAR reference system is a chameleon, which can be adjusted to sound exactly how you want it to sound in real-time.

My “test-bed” system takes on the sound character and sound qualities of the components in use and it is excellent for evaluating what new components have to offer or bring to the table in terms of sound qualities. But with the Acapella TW-1S ION plasma super-tweeters extending the high frequencies, the TBI Emperor subwoofers extending the low frequencies, and the highly detailed & nuanced Digital Audio Denmark AX24 DSD dac streaming HQPLAYER as the source, the “Test Bed” system is a highly resolving system.

As with everything else in life, is there a happy medium or compromise that gives you the best of those worlds? I believe that there is and that great music reproduction systems can be tuned to strike a balance between musicality and resolution. If one listens to the evolution of my OKTAN6 ultimate horn system for instance you can hear that the fine tuning is driving the sound in that direction.

So during last night’s listening session I adjusted the sound of my “Test Bed” system to a more musical sound presentation. The “Test Bed” system is always in flux so it allows me to experiment, explore, tweak, tune, and have fun with it.

Here is an audio recording from last night’s listening session that captures the revised sound presentation and conveys the sound qualities that exemplify a more organic sound versus a more delineated & resolved sound presentation:
 

The Way It Goes

 

carlos269

Great post!

To evaluate any system we must be in the room...

Acoustics and psycho-acoustics  matter ...

From the live event, to the  perspective trade-off recording and mixing choices, to our specific controlled or uncontrolled speakers/room, to our ears/ brain biases and acoustic parameters, we have many acoustic "translation" and trade-off ...No absolute truth...

 

 

The fact that you have the audacity to believe that you can possibly have a clue as to what I wanted something to sound like or rather I was actually successful in achieving that goal. Or that you can determine what is the closet approximation of what it actually ended up sounding like, in the environment that it was mixed and/or mastered, is disillusion to the point of grandeur. I could elaborate for ten pages of why that is absolutely absurd. But, I don’t have the time nor would you listen. You have developed a system for measuring accuracy out of your own ignorance of what exactly exists in the real world, or the resources, compromises, and conditions under which they occur. I could expand on any one of these points for pages. The idea that you can record a sound system, post it on Youtube, and have it reflect the actual performance of said system is a joke without a punchline.

mahgister

To evaluate any system we must be in the room...

That seems so obviously true that it shouldn't even be necessary to actually state it.

There is many things in audio which are evident but need to be said again...

Audio ecological realm  is brainwashed by marketing vocabulary, audio science is more complex than mere engineering...

There exist physical acoustics, and psycho-acoustics. There is engineering and on the other side hearing theory and their relation.

This is complex.

Subjectivist and objectivist, the two groups simplify it and negate the other groups  right to exist in some way ...

it is why i trust acousticians over anyone else...

Acousticians dont participate much in audiophiles thread... They know better...smiley

Many people dont even know that hearing is not a settled scientific problem once for all ...

This is why acoustics is a so interesting and deep matter ...

People look at their gear like at an idol not so much to their room or their ears...

That seems so obviously true that it shouldn’t even be necessary to actually state it.

FWIW:

There is a million+ dollar system on YouTube doing Landslide by Fleetwood Mac.  The highs are extremely rolled off and the system lacks detail.  This is OBVIOUS from the YouTube video and there are $10K systems that will easily outperform what is being posted.  Yes, when you hear the dialog you can tell that the mic is doing a bit of the roll off, but the way it is set up... no

So to say the videos are worthless..., at over a million dollars, I wouldn't even be able to listen to this. blush

https://youtu.be/kVe9SEm69Fg