Striking a balance between musicality and resolution


As my years and experience in this hobby continue to grow I notice a divergence between those seeking extreme resolution and detail from their music reproduction systems and those in search of maximum musicality.

In theory, high-end audio systems should provide more than garden variety stereo systems. In my view that means more detail and information should be heard from a high-end music reproduction system than one hears from ordinary HiFi stereo systems set ups. BUT is there such thing as too much resolution and detail in a stereo system’s sound presentation?

Some people feel that a less detailed presentation that is easier for your brain to process has better flow and provides more enjoyable listening.

So there is the dichotomy. Should one pay more to hear less? Can a frequency response performance that is curtailed at both frequency extremes be desired and praised?

Those that seek a “more musical” presentation usually point to their belief that that is how they hear live un-amplified acoustic music in the real world. In nature, high frequencies attenuate and decay with distance from the source and sound waves get absorbed, diffracted, reflected, and diffused by the environmental factors and landscapes; so they are not wrong in stating that in the real world the sound of music is less detailed and extended. The issue is that when we listen to our music reproduction systems at home we are not listening to live un-amplified music in a concert venue, but rather professionally produced audio recordings typically recorded with close-microphones techniques.

So the question is, do we want our systems to reproduce the sound on the commercial audio recordings accurately or does one want hear the sound the way one thinks that it should sound?

Lucky for me, I have enough systems at home that I have been able to design, set up, and tune them for different targeted resultant sound, sound presentation, and sound qualities. For instance, my OKTAN6 ultimate horn system is a dissecting microscope, my Pinnacle horn system aims at extreme musicality, and my WAAR reference system is a chameleon, which can be adjusted to sound exactly how you want it to sound in real-time.

My “test-bed” system takes on the sound character and sound qualities of the components in use and it is excellent for evaluating what new components have to offer or bring to the table in terms of sound qualities. But with the Acapella TW-1S ION plasma super-tweeters extending the high frequencies, the TBI Emperor subwoofers extending the low frequencies, and the highly detailed & nuanced Digital Audio Denmark AX24 DSD dac streaming HQPLAYER as the source, the “Test Bed” system is a highly resolving system.

As with everything else in life, is there a happy medium or compromise that gives you the best of those worlds? I believe that there is and that great music reproduction systems can be tuned to strike a balance between musicality and resolution. If one listens to the evolution of my OKTAN6 ultimate horn system for instance you can hear that the fine tuning is driving the sound in that direction.

So during last night’s listening session I adjusted the sound of my “Test Bed” system to a more musical sound presentation. The “Test Bed” system is always in flux so it allows me to experiment, explore, tweak, tune, and have fun with it.

Here is an audio recording from last night’s listening session that captures the revised sound presentation and conveys the sound qualities that exemplify a more organic sound versus a more delineated & resolved sound presentation:
 

The Way It Goes

 

carlos269
Post removed 

@steakster in your visits to the universities have you come across any tenured faculty in the physics departments that are less competent than anyone in the industry? I’m not sure what industry you are in but I can assure you that at top universities there are no industry members are on a higher level of knowledge and understanding than those in the faculties of the top technical universities. By the way, what industry are you in? My academic and professional background is in Physics and Electrical Engineering and I have worked for both the most prestigious military & aerospace contractor, on design work for both the space shuttle and international space station programs for NASA, and for the premier electronics firm in the world, responsible for the most sophisticated & capable laboratory test equipment.

Dear @carlos269  I have curiosity why for you is so " important " to listen the YT recordings.

I just really don't care because we have to remember that the human being hear through not only the ears but through the whole body: skin, hair, bones, etc etc.

How measure we all those?  not allisabout measurements, exist other " things " that matters a lot. in audio when we are listening our room/system MUSIC reproduction.

 

R.

@rauliruegas if you can propose a different way, that is convenient, to share audio recordings of our systems with those remotely located then we can consider it. We don’t  have to use YouTube, it is just convenient. Or would you prefer that we continue to discuss the sound of our systems through written text words? It takes courage to share audio recordings of one’s system for others to judge and scrutinize. It is much easier to talk about it in flowery language in words than to expose our reality to others.

Sound as we know it is defined by three descriptors: Frequency, Amplitude, and Phase. As I mentioned earlier, music is a stream of complex composite sound waves. The ears are the primary sensory organ for sound. Neuroscience has several advanced models of sound perception and processing.

On the practical side we can rely on our ears the issue is aural memory. No aural memory can compete with audio recordings. If you think differently then please explain yourself.

@carlos269 

You’ve started a fascinating discussion here, but I do wonder why you’ve put it in amps-preamps. I don’t usually look here so I’m late to the party. Anyway, it’s set me off thinking about musicality and resolution.

Whatever musicality may be, it arises in the source. First, the recording and the mastering. Secondly, the source components - turntable system, streamer/DAC or whatever. Resolution starts at the other end, the loudspeaker system. 

The two go hand in hand. It wouldn’t work if a highly resolving back end showed up a poor source lacking musicality. Conversely, there’d be no point in having a superb front end if the back end couldn’t resolve it’s musicality. 

So in truth, we need both musicality and resolution for good results. Of course, that’s far from the full story.

By the way, I came from Physics originally, too. Not that it helps me that much with audio. Reductionism doesn’t really work as the magic comes from complexity.