Striking a balance between musicality and resolution


As my years and experience in this hobby continue to grow I notice a divergence between those seeking extreme resolution and detail from their music reproduction systems and those in search of maximum musicality.

In theory, high-end audio systems should provide more than garden variety stereo systems. In my view that means more detail and information should be heard from a high-end music reproduction system than one hears from ordinary HiFi stereo systems set ups. BUT is there such thing as too much resolution and detail in a stereo system’s sound presentation?

Some people feel that a less detailed presentation that is easier for your brain to process has better flow and provides more enjoyable listening.

So there is the dichotomy. Should one pay more to hear less? Can a frequency response performance that is curtailed at both frequency extremes be desired and praised?

Those that seek a “more musical” presentation usually point to their belief that that is how they hear live un-amplified acoustic music in the real world. In nature, high frequencies attenuate and decay with distance from the source and sound waves get absorbed, diffracted, reflected, and diffused by the environmental factors and landscapes; so they are not wrong in stating that in the real world the sound of music is less detailed and extended. The issue is that when we listen to our music reproduction systems at home we are not listening to live un-amplified music in a concert venue, but rather professionally produced audio recordings typically recorded with close-microphones techniques.

So the question is, do we want our systems to reproduce the sound on the commercial audio recordings accurately or does one want hear the sound the way one thinks that it should sound?

Lucky for me, I have enough systems at home that I have been able to design, set up, and tune them for different targeted resultant sound, sound presentation, and sound qualities. For instance, my OKTAN6 ultimate horn system is a dissecting microscope, my Pinnacle horn system aims at extreme musicality, and my WAAR reference system is a chameleon, which can be adjusted to sound exactly how you want it to sound in real-time.

My “test-bed” system takes on the sound character and sound qualities of the components in use and it is excellent for evaluating what new components have to offer or bring to the table in terms of sound qualities. But with the Acapella TW-1S ION plasma super-tweeters extending the high frequencies, the TBI Emperor subwoofers extending the low frequencies, and the highly detailed & nuanced Digital Audio Denmark AX24 DSD dac streaming HQPLAYER as the source, the “Test Bed” system is a highly resolving system.

As with everything else in life, is there a happy medium or compromise that gives you the best of those worlds? I believe that there is and that great music reproduction systems can be tuned to strike a balance between musicality and resolution. If one listens to the evolution of my OKTAN6 ultimate horn system for instance you can hear that the fine tuning is driving the sound in that direction.

So during last night’s listening session I adjusted the sound of my “Test Bed” system to a more musical sound presentation. The “Test Bed” system is always in flux so it allows me to experiment, explore, tweak, tune, and have fun with it.

Here is an audio recording from last night’s listening session that captures the revised sound presentation and conveys the sound qualities that exemplify a more organic sound versus a more delineated & resolved sound presentation:
 

The Way It Goes

 

carlos269

@ghdprentice Another way to look at it is, there are pretenders and then there are people with diplomas.

@atmasphere  I try not to engage in the logical fallacy of appeals to authority, but if I decided to appeal to an authority, @atmasphere  would certainly be close to the top of the list. 
 

there is a lot of naval gazing in this hobby, I’m no less guilty of that than anyone else, but sometimes we make things too complex. What it gets down to is whether the recordings and equipment you have in the room where you play them produces something that brings you joy. If it does, you win. at that point, you don’t really have to worry about inner detail, soundstage, acoustic theory, and all the other audiophile words. At that point, you could just sit down and enjoy the music. A lesson I need to learn myself
 

 

To me the solution was obvious in designing the crossovers...,

I’ve included a switch that increases the resolution of the Heil AMT through the addition of a small cap/resistor.  On a poor recording, which may sound grainy or overly bright, I simply turn it off.

 

Music is life. But I see and agree your point @ghdprentice . You are someone I would enjoy meeting. The thinly veiled attacks on engineering credentials, the insult to another poster ability to discern YouTube differences and the mischaracterization of classical music as only format for evaluation lead me to be  like Elvis and leave the building ( this thread anyway ) I wish Agon had an ignore user function.

As mentioned, many of us are on to the witness the original non multi track acoustic event and record it. No O scope required. See Sheffield , Water Lilly, etc….

Carry on 

I wish Agon had an ignore user function.

 

The best "ignore" button already exist: it is the control of your own attention...

 

Myself i dont quit because this is a very interesting and revelatory thread about audio indeed...With more politeness than many others...