Striking a balance between musicality and resolution


As my years and experience in this hobby continue to grow I notice a divergence between those seeking extreme resolution and detail from their music reproduction systems and those in search of maximum musicality.

In theory, high-end audio systems should provide more than garden variety stereo systems. In my view that means more detail and information should be heard from a high-end music reproduction system than one hears from ordinary HiFi stereo systems set ups. BUT is there such thing as too much resolution and detail in a stereo system’s sound presentation?

Some people feel that a less detailed presentation that is easier for your brain to process has better flow and provides more enjoyable listening.

So there is the dichotomy. Should one pay more to hear less? Can a frequency response performance that is curtailed at both frequency extremes be desired and praised?

Those that seek a “more musical” presentation usually point to their belief that that is how they hear live un-amplified acoustic music in the real world. In nature, high frequencies attenuate and decay with distance from the source and sound waves get absorbed, diffracted, reflected, and diffused by the environmental factors and landscapes; so they are not wrong in stating that in the real world the sound of music is less detailed and extended. The issue is that when we listen to our music reproduction systems at home we are not listening to live un-amplified music in a concert venue, but rather professionally produced audio recordings typically recorded with close-microphones techniques.

So the question is, do we want our systems to reproduce the sound on the commercial audio recordings accurately or does one want hear the sound the way one thinks that it should sound?

Lucky for me, I have enough systems at home that I have been able to design, set up, and tune them for different targeted resultant sound, sound presentation, and sound qualities. For instance, my OKTAN6 ultimate horn system is a dissecting microscope, my Pinnacle horn system aims at extreme musicality, and my WAAR reference system is a chameleon, which can be adjusted to sound exactly how you want it to sound in real-time.

My “test-bed” system takes on the sound character and sound qualities of the components in use and it is excellent for evaluating what new components have to offer or bring to the table in terms of sound qualities. But with the Acapella TW-1S ION plasma super-tweeters extending the high frequencies, the TBI Emperor subwoofers extending the low frequencies, and the highly detailed & nuanced Digital Audio Denmark AX24 DSD dac streaming HQPLAYER as the source, the “Test Bed” system is a highly resolving system.

As with everything else in life, is there a happy medium or compromise that gives you the best of those worlds? I believe that there is and that great music reproduction systems can be tuned to strike a balance between musicality and resolution. If one listens to the evolution of my OKTAN6 ultimate horn system for instance you can hear that the fine tuning is driving the sound in that direction.

So during last night’s listening session I adjusted the sound of my “Test Bed” system to a more musical sound presentation. The “Test Bed” system is always in flux so it allows me to experiment, explore, tweak, tune, and have fun with it.

Here is an audio recording from last night’s listening session that captures the revised sound presentation and conveys the sound qualities that exemplify a more organic sound versus a more delineated & resolved sound presentation:
 

The Way It Goes

 

carlos269

@kennymacc I complete agree. Audiophila at its core and how it is practiced by the majority of audiophiles is no different than Scientology. Pay more to attain a higher level and get closer to audio nirvana, only to find out that “at this level of performance it is all about preferences!”. It is about personal preferences at ALL levels of performance. If there is no superiority then it all boils down to differences!

It is about personal preferences at ALL levels of performance. If there is no superiority then it all boils down to differences!

Preferences within our budgets.

Sonic preferences not the same as increased performance.

@cleeds I can verify that YouTube uses AAC (LC)   Here’s the specs on AAC-LC:

AAC-LC128-192kps - Most YouTube videos use 128kps.  Keep in mind this is the "middle".  AAC itself is capable of significantly better sound quality than this, but not on a level of FLAC.

So the sound quality is roughly on a par with MP3’s from about 2010.  Acceptable for videos.

If someone has a link to the video, I can verify it’s the case.

       

@kennyc How do you gauge and measure sound reproduction systems’ performance? What is the standard for analyzing, assessing, and scoring the performance of home audio systems?

kennymacc   The question should be, what did the commercial audio recording really sound like straight from the recording studio

The sounds of recording from studio are nothing like the original sound. Why? Because mics don’t record the true original sound. All best mics are from 40’s and 50’s. Those 60~80 years old mics are all broken now. The new mics sound so bad that all recordings now are so bad. Listen to 60’s a 70’s recordings. Listen to Elvis’s.

uncleang   My sister in law has listened to AM radio her whole life so any frequency over 5K Hz is ’shrill’ to her. The AM band is both musical and natural to her.

You’ll be surprised how clean and nice $20 MP3 players’ sound. Many people here don’t think so because their ears are used to their hi-fis. All hi-fi and hi-end systems are distortion noise monsters. Many people here misunderstand that the distortion noise as a resolution. The distortion noises add up with more addition of parts and equipment. Extra component means more electrical noise too (transformers) which produces dirty sound. 

I can listen $10 am/fm radio and MP3 players, but I can’t listen "hi-end audio systems." The same reason people (almost non-a’philes) who don’t like to hear expensive audio systems. The only hi-end system I can listen (other than my system) is Carlos’s (OP) system in YT which sounds pretty natural and accurate. 

barts  I never have understood how any intelligent person (and there are plenty on this forum) could possibly think that listening to another’s audio system via a recording 

Record your system playing your favorite music with a cell phone. And listen to it few times with cell phone. Now your brain knows how each sounds (voice, drum, piano, guitar, etc.) of your system are from the cell phn. You’ll know cell phone recording sounds almost same as your system sound.

Alex/Wavetouch audio