Huh?
I would go for Leica M series lenses... but that may not be the question.
This was a topic going around in the media this past week. "Do you need more and better pixels or is the resolution on most TVs at the limits of improvement?" The answers... the resolution of most TVs is plenty. There was discussion about the optimum seating distance from the screen was important. Bla bla. Same ole stuff. Is buying a high end, finer pixel rate TV worth it? No. The majority of people don't even adjust their TV once they get it. They buy it and hang it on the wall and plug it in. Most are NOT interested in any improvements made by adjusting. "I just paid alot of money for this thing, don't touch it!" |
“ I paid a lot of money for this thing, don’t touch it!” |
@ghdprentice That's a fine answer for a still video image photography system! I mean moving image pertaining to home theater. @gdaddy1 I agree that that is true for the mass market. But what about the avid videophile / home theater person? If one makes a serious financial investment in home theater then you better be concerned with the best video imaging system you can afford. Or do you mean this holds for the seriously committed enthusiast? |
@gkelly Hi! Interesing comment. I have a product that will improve the performance of the a/v home theater system. It's called Cable Cell. |