@lalitk +1 I do respect your restraint and discipline of quality(SQ) over quantity. With only Jazz/Vocal/Classical and the obvious Pop/Rock selections you can build a nearly 100% Audiophile vinyl collection. Unfortunately my taste in many different music genres can’t be that confined. Without getting too personal what is the music genre breakdown of your vinyl collection and what % do you consider has Audiophile(not near) SQ?
Excellent sounding LPs
To follow up on my post about “ Playable LPs” is a question I was really trying to get at. I used the wrong term in “Playable.” What I’m really trying to ascertain is what percentage of LPs sound really good on your system? I have 2000-3000 LPs but they vary widely in SQ. I’m sure you would agree 90% is not the case.
So, to rephrase my question, what percentage of your records are near or at audiophile quality?
- ...
- 57 posts total
I appreciate your response. My record collection leans heavily toward Jazz and Vocal, with a good mix of Classical and Pop/Rock titles that I consider musically essential rather than purely audiophile. For context, my digital library, a mix of CD rips and DSD downloads, spans music from all over the world with over 900 albums across 95 genres. This library does most of the heavy lifting when it comes to playback. If I had to break it down my records collection, I’d say roughly 70% Jazz/Vocal, 5% Classical, 15% Pop/Rock, and 10% Miscellaneous. Out of those, probably 95% meet what I’d consider true audiophile-level sound quality, carefully selected based on provenance and mastering studio’s. They are well-mastered, well-pressed, and consistently engaging. As with any collection, you are bound to have few that may not be perfect sonically, but they stay in rotation because of their emotional pull and historical importance. As tempting as it is to keep buying vinyl, I simply don’t have the space to store them properly. It’s a constant battle between the heart that wants more records and the shelf space that says enough already. Been there done that with my 5K plus cassette tapes and CD’s collection through 80’s ~ 90’s. At the end of the day, that balance between fidelity and feeling is what keeps the music collection meaningful to me irrespective of the format. |
This is also my philosophy. I have my high quality Albums from the late 60’s, 70’s, early 80’s, then, I switch to Digital. Either playing my late 80's, 90's, 2000's CDs & SACDs directly, or playing the ripped versions (.wav, .dsf) directly -- all through the same DAC. From there, I use Qobuz Hi Rez streaming for all the later and new stuff that I do not want or is cost prohibitive to buy, ie. thousands of songs - again all playing through the same DAC. Overall, this gives me "audiophile" quality, for a huge amount of music, and the music format that makes the most sense for the timeframe it was created. |
+1 @hjdca |
@rvpiano “Playable LP’s” lt sounds like you are possibly overthinking this whole sound quality thing. Music lovers try to extract the best they can from their records, and accept recordings with their set achievable limits. You must have enjoyed all those old records as they are still there. If you are now worried, all convulsed up with audiophile quality, your old music listening love boat may have already sailed. If your music enjoyment has suddenly evolved around quality and not loving the performances, maybe then something has changed. Could you have possibly grown allergic to your own system? |
- 57 posts total

