Mixing or matching component brands


What is your preference and why?

If your system consists of primarily matching brand components, what was the reason for going with the brand?

cb77

mix match the best stuff is the best way to get optimum performance. pigeon-holing yourself makes no sense.

 

Went with current gear cos they allowed me to optimise my listening and room/speaker marriage

Decades ago there was no way to put together a high end system without mixing. Threshold (Pass 1980) made the best amps, Audio Research made the best preamps... including a phonostage back then. There were other budding brands... some, pretty disappointing, a few with a single good type of component. 

So over time these specialty companies increased their engineering expertise and established house sounds. So, now you have the Audio Research sound, Boulder, Burmeister, Linn, MacIntosh, dCS...etc. Each component complimentary and of equal sonic quality. 

There are still differences. My opinion is that Pass still produces better amps, than they do preamps. Their amps continue to improve. Over the last ten years the rhythm and pace has improved across their amps. 

So, if you have the money to buy a top tier that matches your desire for sonic characteristics you will be very rewarded for getting all Audio Research (what I have now), Conrad Johnson, Boulder, Linn, Burmeister... etc. They will be voiced the same way and synergistic. Best case scenario. Then you can connect them with the most transparent wires. 

If you cannot afford this, then you may end up mixing and matching. A tremendously more complex task. The interactions of different sound types makes for a nearly infinite number of combinations. But, if you are good with very complex ambiguous problems, you can do it. It can be fun. Some folks are simply not up to the task and will constantly be let down by their choices, I know some folks like this. They should audition systems and buy the one who’s house sound appeal to them the most., 

I've achieved good results both ways. If you can pair high level components from the same brand there is less worry. Same brand amps and preamps should be built to match, and be a natural fit. There is no reason you can't get great results mixing brands if you take care to study the specs, and make sure their tuning is compatible. 

I've been into audio gear since I was probably 14 years old.   Started out with whatever I could afford. Eventually, I moved up to Yamaha separates in the mid 80s. Amp, preamp, and tuner.  Pretty nice, really.  I started reading Stereophile, so I wanted the highest rated gear that I could afford. That was an Adcom GFA555 amp and NAD 1300 preamp.  Then, I decided to try a conrad-johnson tube preamp (PV-14L) and a Coda amplifier.  That was their strong suit, I think.  I wanted to stay with a tube preamp and solid state amp, so I upgraded to a better Coda amp and a Linear Tube Audio MicroZOTL preamp.  The pair works well together. 

I’ve always mixed components. My first system I had Rotel amp and pre. Cd player and obviously speakers were different. Had that for 23 years with no troubles at all. The last 4 years I’ve had an Aric Audio amp and pre, but different dac, streamer and speakers. Now, I have different amp, dac, streamer and speakers. Good thing about current system is I got hear the components all together before purchasing. Had good synergy so that took the guess work out of it.