I have not listened to a Mk2, so no idea if there are any real sonic benefits over the Mk1
Thanks Tim
From what I have read, the big difference between the Mk1 and the Mk2 is that the Mk2 has a single box to house the power supply and the air pump, making it easier to house them and synchronise switch on. The Mk1 has separate boxes for the power supply and the air pump.
Nothing I have read suggests that these changes make a difference to the sound signature of the turntable system.
Given a constant supply of clean air and a 12-Volt power supply, the design of the table itself looks hard to improve. The Japanese DC motor is very close to the platter rim so there is only a small amount of drive belt that is not tightly controlled.
I assume that the platter air bearing surface is the large stainless-steel ring and that air bleeds at the periphery to provide horizontal positioning for the platter, with an air gap around 10 microns wide. In other words, the only spindle is there to hold a record and a puck.
The bearing for the arm seems equally simple in principle, giving frictionless movement up and down and sideways at the stylus tip, while keeping the cartridge firmly square and at the right distance. All this with no mechanical connection except a very thin layer of air.
Given the air separation between the plinth and both the platter and the arm, mounting the relatively small motor to that relatively big slab of MDF would seem a good way to reduce any motor vibrations

