2. misc-audio
  3. 1410810551

BANG for the BUCK

For most of us it's all about value. Except for the relatively small number of folks who can afford not to worry about how much things cost.

For the rest of us it's all about the price/performance ratio. How much did you pay for what you got in terms of performance? The bang for the buck. I have found some excellent values over the years. And some terrible ones as well, alas. If we look at each class of components and various price points, what good and bad values have you experienced along the way? I'll give a few examples from my own experience to get this thread rolling. These examples are just for starters. They do not represent a complete list. If more come to mind I will add them to the thread later.

My caveat is that my comments are subjective and refer to my system -- and YMMV. I am only speaking for myself and my system here.

In the realm of DACS -- Antelope Gold, AMR DP, Berkeley 1 and EMM CDSA SE are in my price/performance dog house. My current NAD M51 takes the price/performance prize. It is the only DAC that has, so far, given me good value.

In the realm of speakers -- Merlin Monitors and Joseph Audio Pulsars represented good value for my system. But my current Raidho C1.1 monitors take the price/performance prize.

In the realm of cables, power products and power conditioners -- Gabriel Gold and Synergistic Research Tesla Series and Speaker Cells, Interconnect Cells and power conditioners are in my price/performance dog house. David Elrod and Shunyata cables, and the Shunyata Triton power conditioner take the price/performance prize.

In the realm of tweaks -- some of Jack Bybee's products, Schumann resonance devices and Audio Magic products take the price/performance prize.

How about you and your system? What stands out in terms of price/performance -- on both sides of the ledger?
sabai
sabai OP
2,027 posts
 
Mapman,

I agree completely. Small increments are often the best bang for the buck. Throwing money at the problem can be the worst choice. I recently added a used $100 Kemp plug to my system. The improvement in SQ was worth thousands of misspent audio dollars. Live and learn.
sabai OP
2,027 posts
 
In the realm of tweaks -- DIY HFTs also take the price/performance prize. I have not tried the SR HFTs, so I have no basis for comparison. But I can say that my own HFTs are very effective. Thanks to Ozzy for some very creative ideas here. At about $1 each my HFTs are very cost effective. I hate to think how much my system would have cost if I had paid MSRP or the going retail price for everything. I would not have been able to afford a system -- certainly not the system I now have. I estimate I paid about 60% of retail for everything.

I have cut down on costs by finding unusual (inexpensive) items that improve SQ on a level with a component upgrade -- such as the Noise Eater from Holland and Kemp products.

I have cut down on costs by finding retired products such as QRT symphonies that are a fraction of the cost of the Nordost Qx4 that incorporates the same technology.

I have cut down on costs by doing a lot of other special DIY things. Sometimes a little tweak here or there can produce an improvement equal to a component upgrade. This is the kind of cost saver that cannot be quantified.
stringreen's avatar
stringreen
6,370 posts
 
Replaced audiophile grade power wall sockets with Maestro (brand)....the difference was amazing.
sabai OP
2,027 posts
 
Stringreen,

I replaced my Tesla Plex SE with Furutech GTX-D. Amazing results -- takes the price/performance prize.
gooddomino
108 posts
 
Sabai- I apologize in advance for my ignorance. can you explain what a HFT is please?

Thanks, Jack
More to discover