@richardbrand.
Here in New Zealand, we use 3D printing of titanium to build rocket engines . but I digress.
Yes there is a lot of cool tech out there, some dating from way back. The trick is to use this technology to further the state of the art in audio reproduction. A healthy eye on the past along with innovative use of tech advances, rather than slavishly adhering to the current fashion.
All audio equipment design is fundamentally an engineering problem. My passion being TTs which I see as an impossible engineering problem. One can only get as close as possible to the ideal, not actually reach it.
To describe what a TT/TA needs to do is easy. " As viewed by the cartridge rotate the record at a constant speed under dynamic conditions"
To unpick this statement. W & F figures are meaningless if measured by a steady state tone. This is not stressing the system dynamically and the TA will have an impact on the end numbers. Any movement in the platter other than its plane of rotation is viewed by the cartridge as a change in speed. Any play in the main bearing is viewed by the cartridge as a change in speed. Any flexing of the main bearing housing changes the speed. Any resonance or flexing of the chassis (plinth) will be viewed as a change of speed. Outboard, standalone, arm boards need not apply. Any bending, resonance in the arm wand changes the apparent speed, Arm bearing play..... etc etc. The list of speed deviation possibilities is extensive
So when designing a TT we need to consider the perspective of the cartridge and work backwards with this knowledge to reduce these speed change impacts. If we turn this approach on its head and say that absolutely constant speed as viewed by the cartridge is the goal and that any deviation from this is movement, then the TT/TA pair need to be "still" And yeah, there is also the cartridge body in the mix.
Cheers.

