You get me right here :
Now, back to music. I have been thinking about your creative time suggestion, in which musical time comes from the performer.
Your three categories makes no sense for me.
Number one, which I think you like best, is soul wrenching, in which the artist finds his/her musical timing.
This is the first and last necessary category. Why ? Because all music experience is birth by the artists complex set of gesture and breath creating inside our physical measurable quantitative linear time a non linear qualitative non measurable time which is not a duration, nor just a rythm, but a non repeatable improvised spontaneous gesture which become incarnated meaning with his own time dimension as a pure quality with no object.
Number two is for the performer to get the hell out of the way and let the composer shine through.
This made no sense because most music on earth is not even "written"...
And the musician need his body and his "I" (not just his robotic ego ) and more to summon inside him all the gestures necessary to incarnate spirit...
If someone play Liszt piano or Scriabin he need to invest himself totally...He cannot play letting his personality at the door, he must manifest his personality... It is true in jazz and in all music generally...
But for sure Sun RA is not Hildegard of Bingen and neither is a talking Nigerian drum all is a question of balance between our ego and the music to manifest...
And anyway composers are badly served played by people lacking character ...
Number three is to try to create beauty, which I’m not sure you acknowledge or at least like in a musical piece.
This is preposterous sorry. Where did i gave the impression to dismiss "beauty" as the main essence of music ?
Your third category is superfluous because music is beauty in time ....
Read books out of your feminine/masculine window. Reincarnation is almost proven fact by scientific inquiries and testimonies. And i am sorry but no physicist in the world will takes your "feminine physics" seriously.
@mahgister
The reincarnation argument does not seem to me to have any more proof now than it ever did. I know my Buddhist friends believe in it. Perhaps in physics the infinite universe theory might approach reincarnation, but as far as I’m concerned that theory is only a theory. I think physics is from the male mind