Walk-in soundstage


Coupled with his Weiss DAC 204 and T+A DAC 200, Mr. Steve Huff claimed to have experienced the so-called "walk-in soundstage" when using the Lumin U2 as the streaming transporter. This refers to a deeply immersive, three-dimensional stereo image where the listener perceives the musical space as so realistic and spacious that it feels as if one could physically walk into the soundstage.

This level of presentation is notably different from the more common “layered” sound field that many average listeners or reviewers report—where the sound is merely projected in front of the listener with some layering or spatial envelopment.

I'm curious how many of you have also experienced this effect in your own systems and listening spaces. If you're open to sharing, I'd love to hear about the components and setup that helped you achieve it.

  

lanx0003

@richardbrand  I think ESL 63 has similar trait to 57, correct?  Two panels for sure to get stereo sound because one panel is mono and mono is difficult if not impossible to achieve walk-in soundstage.  People even stack two panels per channel (side) for higher sound pressure (see below), wider dispersion and better bass presence.  With that being said, I will probably put this thought on hold until I sort out the basic technicality.

I tried to paraphrase the host's description on ESL 57.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=reF1l84UdbM&t=1427s

"The music feels completely detached from the speakers and floats in the middle. Unfortunately, the soundstage isn’t extremely wide, and when I tried placing the speakers farther apart, something changed — I had to adjust my listening position to recapture the effect. In the end, I decided not to overdo it. This is why some people stack them to increase sound pressure, allowing for a slightly wider placement. As it stands, the presentation is a bit compressed toward the center, but what’s there is absolutely incredible. You wouldn’t believe it until you try." 

@helomech  Yes, a walk-in soundstage is indeed >/= 90% room and speakers. The majority of the remaining 10% or so is the amplification. I’ve heard enough $60K+ digital front ends paired with six figure speakers in enough rooms to know that the front end accounts for nearly zero of the effect, because many of those systems failed to produce said effect. Money ≠ equal performance when it comes to digital components.

I see it as counterproductive to keep this subject contentious simply because it’s not supposed to be. I can only agree with the “Money ≠ Performance” part of the statement, and I’m a strong proponent of that notion. I recently acquired two sub-$1k DACs—far from the price range you referred to—that are fully capable of producing a tall, wide, and deep soundstage with pinpoint-focused imaging. I don’t know which specific DACs or digital transports in the $60k+ range fail to do that effect, but if such units exist, it would be a huge pity to see that investment wasted.

I don’t pretend to hear what I don’t. Before acquiring these two DACs, all my previous units could produce a decent soundstage (SS) in all dimensions except depth. And believe me, I’ve already optimized my setup and speaker placement in rooms prepared to reveal deep SS once a capable DAC and digital transport were in place. After months of tireless experimentation, the day my R2R DAC and transporter combo was fully broken in, I could hardly believe what I was hearing from that combo—a soundstage wider than the speakers, taller in a way that mimicked an actual singer’s or performer’s presence, and most importantly, deep enough to feel as if you could walk into it. Without pinpoint imaging and a dark background, such a space simply doesn’t exist.

Of course, this experience doesn’t occur with every piece of music. As many have noted, the spatial cues must be present in the recording. Ultimately, it comes down to whether your gear can preserve and reproduce that information. As I’ve said before, if your DAC only produces a “wall of sound,” forget about a walk-in SS. And if your digital transport suffers from jitter or electrical noise, spatial cues will be lost due to timing errors.

Here are two specific music tracks that reproduce this effect in my listening spaces:

  1. “Zulu Voodoo”Kalya Scintilla, Illusions

  2. “Flamenco’s On Fire”Kalya Scintilla, Illusions

Let me know if you’d like more examples or different genres.

Speaker placement is equally important—on par with the digital front end, in fact. In my case, I pull my speakers 4 feet from the front wall (for depth) and 3 feet from the side walls (to avoid smearing from early reflections). The speakers are 11 feet apart with a slight 15° toe-in for my main rig in the living room, and 8.5 feet apart, facing straight ahead, for my second rig in the master bedroom. I’ve found these distances beneficial for widening SS and improving instrument separation. Finally, I have heavy window drape up front and bass traps but don’t treat the side walls, since I’ve found some reflective sound can help widen the SS—as Floyd Toole has also pointed out.

It all matters. You have to have a source that can reproduce the spatial cues inherent in the recording, amplification that maintains or perhaps enhances the effect, speakers that do not diffract or otherwise distort the wave and a room that minimizes spurious reflections. 

Works for me.


 

 

When i read such thread i measure how much most people had no clue about acoustics concepts and parameters...

A walk in soundstage is a way to describe the balance ratio between  ASW/LEV parameters if we learn how to control them...

 I created it  in my first acoustical dedicated room with my "mechanical room equalizer " a grid of 100 Helmholtz resonators mechanically tunable but we need a recording very well done to achieve complete "walk in" like the Weil four penny opera with with Lotte Lenya for example... No room/ speakers controls replace recording trade-off limits and possibilities...A bad recording stay bad even in controlled environment...

 I could not create it in my near field  actual location for many reasons linked to the speakers  design limitations and the impossibility to use my grid of resonators in my specific location.. My resonators work on "timbre" perception  but not in the same way  on spatial qualities,bunched together in a very small room and not distributed in a larger room

Neither with  my headphone, even if they give me "out of the head speaker like impressions" i enjoy a lot ... The K340 save my life when i lost my room...

 

Gave me 7,000 bucks and i will buy the  " dac " or best said the acoustic set of filters tailored for your hearings created by Edgar Choueiri in a battling of the eye...

No need to create a tuned 100 Helmholtz resonators precisely located around my room and listening position... Which task i cannot do no more because i dont have the room for it now nor  i want to go redoing this tuning by ears arduous task again on many months ...

cool