hi @ledoux1238 yeah it was a big deal for me. i replaced both. it just got so easy when i find them online and the post was so quick. i imagined glue and all sorts of things. not the case.
the magnets that came in the "collars" had an outer dia of 185 and inner dia of 95 mm (20 mm thick). the magnets couple to the steel "collars". to remove the old ones was easier. less powerful. somehow i could lever with a cloth and screwdriver and up they would come. i needed the cloth less i fracture the ferrite.
installing the new ones which are Y30 ferrite and 180 mm OD and 100 mm ID (20 mm thick) was tricky because very difficult to remove once in the collar. very strong. nothing much to grab once they are flat on collar. i put a magnet in wrong (opposite polarity). to remove it was very tricky. i ended up using wideset long handle pliers and a soft cloth. you just need to get an edge up. adjusting position also very tricky but very necessary to optimise wobble. also more powerful magnets made it very tricky to assemble the la platine. that is putting on top platter assembly, now more powerful magnets will push the bottom assembly out of alignment unless i am very careful.
i have got a factory in china now making me another 2 sets of magnets but these will be Y35 ferrite which is stronger and longer lasting. i anticipate it will be about 25% stronger and also will have dimensions of 190 mm OD and 89 mm ID so as long as i can get them in, i will really have better magnet coverage in the collar and stronger magnets hence more repulsion in aggregate.
it is dubious whether more repulsion will do anything good for me. i mean alot of people run the platter just resting on the ball so does it matter if there is a 1 mm gap versus a 10 mm gap versus 20 mm? i guess the way i see it is i don't anticipate an impact on stability from less bearing being in top platter assembly but i think we could have less noise and less friction.

