Apple Lossless vs iTunes Plus

Apple Lossless vs iTunes Plus
Any audible difference between the two? I only buy/import from CD's in Apple Lossless but I would like to stop buying CD's.
Sakahara

Sakahara, It is very easy to use your CDs to test the iTunes Plus 256 kbps AAC encoding. Just change the Import Setting preference when ripping your CD and when importing choose "Don't Replace"

Whether there is an audible difference will depend on *your* music playback system, and *your* hearing ability. Do try a test with a few different songs. I found with certain songs it is very difficult to tell. Some listeners systems have such high fidelity and acute hearing that they are able to tell the difference like it was comparing wine to water.

cheers, ed

I didn't know what iTunes + was at first (thought it was another garbage compression codec like MP3, only slightly better), and once I found out I realized I could import my CD's with AAC to compare. I was curious to hear others opinions though.

My system is very resolving, hearing too, so I will probably notice a difference.

Regarding storage of iTunes Library on external drive; I thought of this too. Wouldn't there be access issues, even with FW800, compared with the system drive? Maybe use NAS instead? It is more sensible though, especially since mine is larger then my system capacity - 140 GB and counting.

I wonder if these iTunes + lossy files are made from originals? I can only hope.

Is there an obvious audible difference between Apple Lossless, WAV and AIFF? I haven't compared. From what I read Apple Lossless seemed good enough.

sakahara, a great number of users have music stored on external drives. some have over 2000 CDs in ALC or WAV no way to fit that on a system drive in a notebook (yet). Transfer speed of USB 2 is adequate for music files. I use a FW 400 750MB drive with 600+ CDs and have another duplicate drive with backups. BTW my files are AIFF/WAV (no compression) No problem here. My system is linked below.

On the sound difference - since you are looking for opinions. Yes I can hear the difference in different formats. No I cannot hear the difference in formats. It is song dependent for me. Simpler music it is more apparent. complicated electronic music it is less apparent.

cheers, ed

Ckorody……
Big thanks. I’ve been out of the hardware loop for a while it would seem.

Sfar……..
Thanks I’ll definitely use those links.

Sakahara……...
I continue to see diffs from one media player to another… one encoder/decoder, to another, more so than from one lossless file format to another.

I’d suspect any AAC files being sold by iTunes were ripped off a very good disc or even one such as we could go get… seeing as how they are paying the artist/lable for the rights to resell their info. It wouled make good sense for them to provide as good a source disc as possible… Wouldn’t it? I know too that some of these deals are time sensitive and run for predetermined lengths… likely with extensions available or matters of course. I say this as some tracks I’ve bought years ago are now no longer available from the iTunes store.

Re remote drive speed

Both the OS and the attached drive are important… though it does depend on the actual configuration or set up being used.

Wireless 11G has enough thru put to accommodate music very well. Even with lossless files… WAV, AIF, ALAC & FLAC. Usb too has sufficient speed to prevent drop outs or delays. The Vista OS wireless adapter protocol however does have some aspects which need to be configured differently or disabled entirely to avoid problems. For more info on speeding up Vista there are numerous resources online that cover all sorts of items one can do to gain speed. The ‘auto tune’ feature is primarily the obstacle that caused me a lot of trouble. I posted a resolution I found online in another thread here and the steps to overcome it. See this thread:

http://forum.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/fr.pl?icomp&1233137449&openmine&zzBlindjim&4&5#Blindjim

Ether net (wired networks) don’t suffer from the same idiosyncracies wireless ones may. My Vista laptop isn’t as ‘crisp’ feeling as are my desktops, but the result is more than acceptable. Quite good in fact and better in some respects aside from sheer speed. Albeit Vista appears to be as Windows ME (Melinium) edition … just a cash grab… as now there’s another OS just around the corner being readied for distribution.

Vista’s sonics though are superior to XP’s.