Why do some amplifiers throw a bigger soundstage than others?


Was watching a YouTube video comparing two Excellent class A amplifiers . the reviewer preferred, the one which threw a wider soundstage with the same set of speakers. Specified channel separation in db iis about the same in all quality amplifiers., so why does this happen?

rrm

In the “everything matters” way of thinking, the only valid test setup is to use identical conditions for both DUTs, and to introduce nothing extra into the apparatus that isn’t required for critical listening…that means no ABX switches, disconnecting and reassembling hookups, etc., which takes time.  Critically matching playback level is known to be a necessity in assessing quality.  How many of us can recall the sound well enough to judge in light of these factors?  I am in agreement with Jasonbourne on this one…I also believe the preamp is more instrumental in establishing soundstage than the power amp is in my experience.

I have one more theory. Amps differ in their ability to provide current into low impedance and phase shifted loads. The type of amp (class A for example) doesn't tell you how well it provides current. If the speakers in question have an impedance dip in part of the frequency range and one amp provides more current into low impedance loads, the speakers will have a different frequency response between one amp and the other. This difference in frequency response could explain issues like a difference in soundstage.

I've heard a dramatic example of this. I have a pair of Thiel CS6 speakers that dip to around 2 ohms in part of the frequency spectrum. I run them with a Krell KSA 300S that doubles its power down to one ohm (300 watts @ 8 ohms, 2400 watts @ 1 ohm). When I took the amp in for recapping I tried hooking up my Onkyo A/V receiver to the Thiels. The results were laughable. The Onkyo sounded like an AM radio. The soundstage was flat as a pancake. I figured there would be a difference but I had no idea it would be that dramatic.

IMO, many if not most audiophiles do not fully appreciate the impact that speaker impedance curves have on the sound of a particular amplifier. Two amps with identical power at 8 ohms can sound radically different on a given set of speakers depending on the speakers' impedance curve and the ability of the amps to provide current into difficult loads.

I have a pair of Thiel CS6 speakers that dip to around 2 ohms in part of the frequency spectrum. I run them with a Krell KSA 300S that doubles its power down to one ohm (300 watts @ 8 ohms, 2400 watts @ 1 ohm). When I took the amp in for recapping I tried hooking up my Onkyo A/V receiver to the Thiels. The results were laughable. The Onkyo sounded like an AM radio. The soundstage was flat as a pancake. I figured there would be a difference but I had no idea it would be that dramatic.

@8th-note Your conclusion might not be accurate - its very likely that current had nothing to do with it.

To present a sound stage the mids and highs need to be reproduced properly. You usually don't need current for that since most speakers are fairly easy to drive in the mids and highs. Theils tend to have their weird impedance issues in the bass region, which has nothing to do with presenting a sound stage.

If the Onkyo has a power amp input I would run your preamp into that and see if you still say the same thing. Of course by now the issue might be moot since this is an anecdote; my point is that there were a lot more variables going on here than you initially surmised.

Our OTLs are known for a very good soundstage and yet they have a high output impedance so can't deliver the power into lower impedances. Our class D can- but the sound stage of our class D vs our OTLs is nearly identical.

 

 

 

 

atmasphere

11,504 posts

…impedance issues in the bass region, which has nothing to do with presenting a sound stage.

@atmasphere is this statement meant to rule out bass as being important to listener perception of soundstage? That would seem doubtful… query not intended as a challenge for which I have empirical grounds, just interested.

 

atmasphere

11,504 posts

…Our OTLs are known for a very good soundstage and yet they have a high output impedance so can’t deliver the power into lower impedances. Our class D can- but the sound stage of our class D vs our OTLs is nearly identical.

And this would make that potential discrepancy even more interesting.

 

 

 

crustycoot

572 posts

…I also believe the preamp is more instrumental in establishing soundstage than the power amp is in my experience.

Not sure you intended it but, that’s gonna be the pun to beat today.

As a monoral signal has no separation, by the same token, it would seem to me that an amp with better channel separation would throw a wider soundstage than one with poor separation.

BUT, perhaps a bit of out-of-phase channel crosstalk could make the image wider? 

Also, one would want both channels to be/track as identically as possible, to keep the soundstage from shifting about.  If a channel lacks what the other has, it can't really produce mono for a proper center image at that frequency/volume.  This would apply anywhere along the audio chain.