Anyone reading this post thread should probably visit the Ken Fritz virtual system. I spent some time reading through the comments mostly to read what he said.
His comments were very generous and detailed and took great interest communicating all he did. He liked to share what he was doing clearly. Reading these comments leaves me with a very positive feeling about this guy. He had a company he worked very very hard and was doing something he really really enjoyed. We should all be so lucky and talented to do what he did .
He spent a lot of time on limiting devices to protect speakers during home theatre operation which is a new thing I've never heard of. And clearly he was very obsessed with creating speakers and purchasing a lot of drivers to do just that. I still find it hard to believe his speakers could not realize more when they were sold.
At least he immortalized his work in a documentary. I'm sure just about everybody on this forum would have loved to spend time with this man. And this is where I fault the article. clearly the Washington Post was neglectful by sensationalizing some negative aspects a family relationships, and distorting this man's Legacy.
