I don't want to beat a dead horse but I'm bugged.

@teo_audio ,

It took me about 5 minutes to find other academics to call out Peterson on his limited interpretations of creativity not to mention method errors in assuming even for simple creativity tests that test subjects are levelled in their existing abilities. I will leave it to you to look up what that means. I will give you a hint it is related to cultural influences on IQ tests.

However, it is best to simply use Jordan’s own words at 3:31 in this video, "The CAQ is also potently predicted by IQ as expected". CAQ is a creativity score.

https://m.facebook.com/drjordanpeterson/videos/did-you-know-that-creative-people-have-less-death-related-thoughts/500540930657554/

Jordan is well known and I even agree with many things he says including the need for creative people to have some other grounding. This is often an issue with high academic performers in physics, chemistry and engineering due to the creativity of their divergent thinking having the potential to make multiple focuses challenging.

He is well known but his ideas are not all universally accepted. Previous to his gender stance he was a known but not exceptional academic.

Philosophy OWNS science’s ass. Totally. Irrevocably so. Philosophy and the rigors of logic in complex extremis, is what created, framed.. and gave the playground of existence TO science.

Says "the guy" typing that on his cell phone or computer , developed using hard core science, communicated over the Internet (also hard core science), probability with some RF and optical thrown in (also hard core science). And what does it all have in common? All developed by people who couldn't give a care to philosophy that tries to answer questions that most people could not care less about and even if a philosopher comes up with an "answer" 10 other will disagree and 10000 people totally unaware someone was even thinking about it will still go about moving the world forward. 

Even philosophers debate the death of philosophy and whether it has any meaning let alone value in a world where life's mysteries are one by one decoded and demystified. One thing is true, philosophers don't seem to have intended philosophy to be weaponized as a justification for willful ignorance nor as an excuse for a lack of personal enlightenment and certainly not as a shield to avoid the harsh reality of knowledge.

http://cup.columbia.edu/book/the-death-of-philosophy/9780231147781

And in a funny twist, my personal lawyer is a former professional musician.

They will not remove you if you do that. They will keep you and will pile on you. On purpose. Like vultures. They have an official policy (not kidding),  a narcissist procedure of “cat and mouse “ sort of game. They will play you from a position of competence and utmost superiority.

Sounds a lot like what's been going on here as of late. I noticed as much in the style and manner of writing of a few recent newcomers.

All the best,
Nonoise

They have an official policy (not kidding), a narcissist procedure of “cat and mouse “ sort of game. They will play you from a position of competence and utmost superiority.

 

Official policy huh? :-)

I said Audiokarens as a joke. Now I am not so sure.