Opinion on NAD C368 bridged with C268?


Opinion on NAD C368 bridged with C268? Is there better for the price?
tmicelli
I used single NAD c368 ( compared it before had bought with A12, A14, CX60, CX80, some Yamaha and Onkyo ), Nad sounded best for me.

Then I bought c268 due to lack of power ( speakers are still budged - debut F6, which needs loooots of power ).

with c368/c268 bridged different system, everything is more then ok ( of course in that price level ), now waiting ( few weeks ) for  new speakers - vela 407.

So for me  this combo is worthy thinking about ..its my opinion  You should check it and decide by yourself.

regards
Michael 
I also just picked up NAD 368 BluOs. I am running PMC TB2i signatures speakers and streaming Tidal Master files. I am general pleased with the sound although I feel it lacks a bit of complexity. Also toying with the idea of adding a NAD C268 and mono blocking. 

I have been seeking advice on the benefits vs disadvantages so this thread is great. From what I have researched it enables a much better dynamic curve your speakers can handle/produce "opening up" your music. My concerns are adding more components to a line can sometimes enter in more chance of interference and distortion. Thoughts?
Hi Darberb, did you go for the C268? or at least did you have the chance to listen for differences (if any) using the bridge mode with mono-amps setup? Thank you for your comments.