Experiences with Audio Research LS-2B

Wow !! This hobby(addiction?) sure is fun with such strong divergent views on the same equipment.While I am new to tubes,the LS 2B is my first foray into the tube world,I strongly endorse Jax2 that the LS 2B is outstanding value for money.Incidentally,if you scan some of the UK audio mags(eg. April issue of HiFI News,the LS 2B,is quoted at around sterling 1250 upwards ie $1600 or so.
A little over a month back I traded in a Bryston BP 25/4 BST for an ARC LS 2B and Bryston 14 BST, AFTER a week long home demo featuring both the LS 2B and the CJ PV10.While I admit that what works in my system may be anathema in a different system/musical context, on a straight A/B comparison,the LS 2B is miles ahead of the CJ 10 PV,notwithstanding a brilliant phono stage. I'll stick my neck out to the extent that the (circa 1995 ??)LS 2B mated with a monster ss power amp such as the Bryston 14 BST produces a more musical and realistic soundstage than the BP 25, with an almost vice like grip on the speakers(B&W CDM 9NTs).Strictly speaking I should add that the LS 2B came with a hugely expensive cable upgrade from a pair of $ 50 vdh/chord i/cs to >$1000 plus Cardas Golden Cross/Cross.
Net net,if you can find a LS 2 in working condition with or without balanced outputs(the B version), grab it as it represents outstanding value for money.
Not to get too carried away with the LS 2B,the couch potato in me misses the remote.Would appreciate views on remote tube preamps under $2500.
Happy listening.

Sunnyboy hit it right on the head: The potentials for differences in personal response to a given component or tweak can be as different as night and day. I've said it many times; it's all about synergy & personal preferences, combined with one's experience and expectations. Jafox (thanks for the preface, by the way, John) seems to have had a wider experience than me with other ARC components, whereas my experience is only with the one ARC pre (as well as with the GNS mod of that pre). Obviously we both are using the gear within distinctivly different systems/listening rooms, with likely very different preferences and expectations. Ultimately everything you read here is a generalization at best and should be taken with a bag full of salt (my own included). Your own ears are the very best guage of all, period! Anyone who tells you different is standing knee deep in manure! There are no aboslutes. Just like there are folks who do not recognize a great Zinfandel to be "superior" to wine dispensed from a box, there are those who hear no difference in listening to music through a boom box or a $50K system (perhaps they 'hear' a difference, but they just don't care, and or don't recognize that difference as being "superior"). It's all relative. Like Jafox, Steve Huntley also has much experience with ARC gear having worked there for many years. I emailed him recently to confirm that I'd quoted him correctly. He wrote back and did add that his favorite ARC pre's (non-reference) were the LS2B and the LS5, and that he prefers both with his mods. I can certainly agree with him on the LS2B, and have no doubt his mod of the LS5 would kick that pre up a notch. Jafox rightly does point out that he is comparing the LS5 at an average of twice the (used) cost of the LS2B, so I'm not surprised that the LS5 may indeed be a better pre in comparison, and do appreciate understanding what may be some of the reasons why (I am not saying that just because it cost more it does sound better, but I'd certainly expect it to, especially given that is from the same manufacturer and designed later). I still stand by my own (personal) experience that, for the price you pay on the used market, the LS2B does a damn fine job in my experience, and has mated well with a diversity of components. As I mentioned, with my 300B SET's I had the same experience of the LS2B as Jafox describes (cold, analytical, and not musical at all). But that has not been the case in the majority of other amps I've paired it off with. Also, the tube choice made a BIG difference in my experience. It may be interesting to note that the folks reviewing the LS2 on AudioReview are pretty happy with it too as it holds a 4.89/5 rating there with 9 reviews. Further mixed input can be found on AudioAsylum. Doing a search there you will find some opinions that fall more in line with what Jafox opines, and I do respect his point of view, BTW. I have not listened to all of the ARC gear he mentions so cannot comment on the comparisons he offers beyond this. You are right Sunnyboy; it's a good forum and offers a diversity of input that helps point you in the right general direction at best, but can just as easily be misleading. Ultimately your own ears will be the best judge.

Hi all,

I have acquired an Audio Research LS2MKII in excellent condition and a Parasound HCA-2200 power amp. I dont know how to set everything up and see how it works but not to sure where to start. This equipment is a bit older than I am familiar with. Ultimately I would like to connect an Apple TV device as the source. If anyone is able to help it would be much appreciated!!

Thank you
Brandon  

@haligan343,
Assuming you have functioning tubes in the LS2, just connect its outputs to the inputs of the Parasound. Connect speakers to the Parasound. Connect RCA outputs from the Apple TV to the Aux inputs of the LS2. 
Turn the volume all the way down when you power it up and give it a minute or two to warm up before switching from standby mode to play. This should all be pretty straightforward. 
If you don't know if your tubes have life, you might call a local dealer and ask if they have a tube tester that you can use. 
Cheers,
Spencer