A full range speaker?


Many claim to be, but how many can handle a full orchestra’s range?

That range is from 26hz to around 12khz including harmonics, but the speakers that can go that low are few and far between. That is a shame, since the grand piano, one of the center points of many orchestral and symphonic performances, needs that lower range to produce a low A fully, however little that key is used.

I used to think it was 32hz, which would handle a Hammond B-3’s full keyboard, so cover most of the musical instruments range, but since having subs have realized how much I am missing without those going down to 25hz with no db’s down.

What would you set as the lower limit of music reproduction for a speaker to be called full range?

 I’m asking you to consider that point where that measurement is -0db’s, which is always different from published spec's.
128x128william53b
An open baffle recipe.

Woofer: AE 15” dipole., larger or smaller depending on room size.

Midrange: SEAS Exotic X1-08, F8, 8 ohm, 8" Full Range Driver

Tweeter: Mundorf AMT27D1.1 Dipole Air Motion Tweeter

About $5k, just for the drivers.
I attempt to build systems reaching under 25Hz, my criteria for full range in any speaker attempt at SOTA.

Systems reaching down to 15Hz are an entirely different experience.   :)
Post removed 
Millercarbon has it right - the low extension depends more on your room than you would think.I do not see yet the question answered though: can a single driver speaker reproduce an orchestra?Yes it can. Fostex FE204 Voigt pipes I built can. It has particularly truthful piano reproduction, the best approaching a real piano I heard so far from speakers.
How can it be?The brain makes sense of the fundamentals ONLY when the upper harmonic spectrum is correct. With single driver speakers there is a flawless continuity with the upper harmonics, so even though the 26Hz fundamental is already quite rolled off, but you have the 52Hz & up harmonics PERFECTLY lined up, so your brain will reconstruct the 26hz fundamental that's not physically audible, and the lowest note will be there in absolute harmonic richess, although lighter in weight (versus the heavy handed, but dried up 26Hz that you get from a powered sub or additional base driver that has different resonant characteristics than the upper drivers, hence the tonal spectrum goes south.)
Audio technology is not perfect, each solution has advantages and disadvantages. People assume that adding more drivers is a perfect solution, however, it has its own compromises.
Also, I'd like to add that I have not heard any commercial full ranger that comes anywhere to a full range experience, although I have not heard any properly set up. (With FR speakers proper speaker placement & amp matching is beyond vital.) Improper FR speaker set up: shrill and annoying sound. Proper set up: listened to Beethoven IX on them right after listening to Bethoven IX with live orchestra, and the FR gave a better experience than the live one. Just a thought... FR can sound great.  Also, I heard the best timpani on these FRs. ;). They are not brutes, don;t expect titanic crashing the iceberg and peeling your plaster to strike massive egos. Think base that has 3D definition, kettle drum that you literally can see in your room, with the skin vibrating and the waves washing over you and stopping your heart for a second - not from brute speed, not the sound-trying-to-rape-your-room, but the intense speed that defies what we expect from recorded sound. FR drivers can do more in the base department, because the ultra high sensitivity gives them the dynamic / speed edge.   (Need I add: 95dB and higher sensitivity FR...)
Bruce Edgar had a FR speaker made with Lowther 6PMA, maybe you can find one around... (he made very few though.) That's an outstanding FR!!!! Practically no Lowther shout, yet all of the Lowther speed and best low extension of any FR I heard.