^^^ AudioVoodooScienceReview.com. I thought this name would be more accurate to describe them.
So you think wire conductors in cables are directional? Think again...
Here is a very relevant discussion among physicists about the directionality...the way signal and electrons should flow... based on conductor orientation. Some esoteric, high-end manufacturers say they listen to each conductor to see which way the signal should flow for the best audio quality.
Read this discussion. Will it make you rethink what you’re being told and sold?
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-copper-conductor-directional.975195/
Read this discussion. Will it make you rethink what you’re being told and sold?
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-copper-conductor-directional.975195/
- ...
- 523 posts total
jea483,582 posts05-14-2021 5:04pm edgewound@ edgewound , where did you read that? Here... " Electric charges typically flow as slowly as a river of warm putty. And in AC circuits, the moving charges don’t move forward at all, instead they sit in one place and vibrate." Taken directly from one of your cited sources. And this... " Electric energy can even flow in a direction opposite to that of the electric current. In a single wire, electric energy can move continuously forward while the direction of the electric current is slowly backwards. In AC circuits the energy flows continuously forward while the charges are alternating back and forth at high frequency. The charges wiggle, while the energy flows forward; electric current is not energy flow." From your cited source here... Electric energy can even flow in a direction opposite to that of the electric current. In a single wire, electric energy can move continuously forward while the direction of the electric current is slowly backwards. In AC circuits the energy flows continuously forward while the charges are alternating back and forth at high frequency. The charges wiggle, while the energy flows forward; electric current is not energy flow. |
"You must be new around these parts. What you're describing, as if for the first time, has been going on for way too many years. Nothing about any of these discussions is new- just the latest crop of objectivists raising old arguments." I am very much not new to audio. This is not an objectivist/subjectivist thing. I was very much make fun of both. Anyone who uses those terms in a serious manner is not an audiophile, but they want everyone else to think they are. This had been going on a long time. It will stop for the most part eventually. The hanger ons keep getting older and older. |
| Post removed |
- 523 posts total