I will stick with my initial analysis. Poorly supported conclusion based on false summaries of other works, that I suspect he does not even have the academic background in many cases to understand let alone comment on.You dont even know his basic affirmation...
You have not read it...
And you insult his intelligence without even knowing him...
I am flabbergasted by your prejudices....
But i will mute myself for now...
I have not study it enough either and i am not an audio specialist...
but you dont seems to have a clue about what this writer want to adress in psychoacoustic....
Why pitch perception, an objective phenomenon with human endowed with perfect pitch perception, cannot be completely reduced to physics concept of frequency or explained by it...The writer use mechanical experiments to point what is lacking to the frequencies approach of Helmholtz to explain pitch perception...He also touch phonology/phonetic deep problems in language and this part interest me very much also....
I am not competent to gives an authorized opinion for sure.... I am not sure you are either, his affirmation and experiments goes on a complete other direction than orthodox research in psychoacoustic...And even Lord Kelvin explained to all that physics in 1900 was touching the end...He cannot fathom the Planck revolution to come... Then i dont doubt the competence in physics of Kelvin no more than your own competence in audio....
Anyway i will stay silent for the moment....And this thread is not about Sound but about direction in wires.... then...

