Thanks for the responses. All seem to agree the Bryston was advanced for its day and remains a solid performer, at least insofar as the basic internals are involved. Mesch asks "what kind of 'noticeable' difference are you looking for" and that is the fundamental issue that prompted my question. Honestly I can't answer that because I don't know what is out there given the tremendous advancement in delta sigma and R-2R DACS. My assumption is that the Bryston, while indeed capable (and currently providing what I judge to be a better option that the DAC in the Bluesound Node 2i) given its age must have been surpassed sonically by currently available DACs even in a lesser price range. To my ear the Topping D90 added much to the performance of my other system (principally used for home theater) where when listening to music feeds a Denon receiver to a pair of B&W 805s speakers. While not all vintage equipment has been surpassed in performance by later technology, I guess I just believe I must be missing something with the Bryston. Unable to audition among highly regarded DACs such as the Cord Qutest, RME ADI 2, Denafrips Pontus II (ore even Ares II) and others I looked to the forum for suggestions and guidance.
Move on from my Bryston BDA-1?
Given the advancement in DAC technology would I achieve a noticeable (started to say significant) improvement in audible performance by upgrading from my current (but early generation) Bryston BDA-1? I am hesitate on the assumption that the internals of the Bryston (e.g., power supplies, output stage) are still hi-grade but understand the CS-4398 chips have been surpassed. I should mention in the system I stream from a Bluesound Node 2i (and in another use an identical streamer with a Topping D90 DAC).
- ...
- 17 posts total
- 17 posts total