Solid states more accurate than tubes?


Ever since I changed speakers from a pair of Maggie's to Proac's, I find the tonal balance more accurate with a ss, especially acoustic wood instruments. Tubes seem to lack that tonal accuracy. I believe it's a more realistic and accurate rendering. Is that a fair assessment? I'm not arguing tubes don't sound good with it's rich, warm sound but just not as accurate. 
jaferd
Systems are about mating components.
Look at these Proac impedance graphs at Stereophile:
https://www.stereophile.com/images/archivesart/808P28fig1.jpg
https://www.stereophile.com/images/archivesart/610PD2fig1.jpg
https://www.stereophile.com/images/320PD2Rfig1.jpg

Proac’s could be a nightmare for some SS.
Their roller coaster impedance is not transformer ideal.

BTW, I have tube and SS amps. Tubes drive the mids & tweets on LFT-8b, both of which are near resistors. M-125s drive the mids, PL5 tweets. NuPrime ST-10 for the woofs. The M-125s are highly modified to correct factory defects. See  http://www.ielogical.com/Audio/VTA_M-125.php
Probably the most accurate amp you can get is the Benchmark AHB2. They would work with your speakers.
Might want to consider Linear Tuba Audio for tube amplification with SS detail. 
This may be more of a philosophical question but isn't there only one true fidelity and is the technology there, either ss or tube or a combo that's capable of achieving that or is that a myth?  Then there's also a good likelihood that accurate reproduction may not be pleasing although I've never thought live orchestra or acoustic bands sound bad. 
jaferd -- Accuracy in a system can be a double-edged sword.   If fate decrees it that your favorite music has been recorded terribly, sometimes it helps if your system is slightly more forgiving, i.e., more euphonic & less accurate.