Do we really need anything greater than 24/96? Opinions?
I think I just figured out how to tell when atdavid is lying. His lips are moving. 😬 Most people are blissfully unaware there is a problem with stray laser light. It’s the biggest cruel joke the devil ever played on naive audiophiles. Much less what it sounds like or what to do about it. But I do. https://www.photonics.com/Articles/Minimizing_Stray_Light_in_Everyday_Optical_Systems/a63577 |
See what I mean Porscheracer. GK's target market is people who don't think for themselves. Therefore, instead of providing information on C2 error rates, discussing the SNR of the detection system, discussing the off-angle rejection ratio of the optical system, or frankly anything relevant, he posts a link to a generic article in an attempt to make it look like he knows what he is doing, and yet, he has not even done the most basic of tasks, defining the nature of the problem. |
Yup Porscheracer, he will triple and quadruple down. He could simply provide easily measured error rates, jitter from CD players common in the audiophile world, heck anything. Nope, more subterfuge. Next he will probably give us the reasons why amplifiers cannot provide 250db SNR. GK, you could simply say 24/96 is good enough and let it go, not provide multiple irrelevant posts that show you have nothing to refute 24/96 is enough. |
