Review: Denon DL 103R Cartridge


Category: Analog

I recently acquired the Denon DL 103R cartridge from a shop on Ebay to replace the Sumiko Blue Point cartridge that I have used for most of the last 10 years or so.

The DL103R was the lst part of a larger scale system upgrade including new interconnects and the addition of a used DBX 3BX range expander that I use to enhance the dynamics primarily of analog sources on my system (Carver tuner and a Linn Axis turntable with Linn Basik tonearm).

I use DNM reson interconnects to connect the DBX unit to the signal processing jacks on a Carver c-9 pre-amplifier. The c-9 is connected via the tube-emulation outputs to a Carver mt4.0t power amp using Harmonic Technology Truthlink interconnects.

Dynaudio Countour 1.3 MkII monitors are used as the main speakers on the system. The solid state outputs from the c-9 connect to an old but classic NAD receiver power amp section which can be used to drive a combination of 2 other speaker pairs connected throughout the house via in-wall wiring. The other speakers are a pair of Ohm Walsh 2s and a custom-modified pair of Ohm Ls. This allows me to audition music on three separate pairs or speakers in three separate rooms from my main system as desired.

For this review, I can compare the sound of the DL 103R to the Sumiko Blue point cartridge using the primary Carver mt4.0t power amp and Dynaudio Contours with the DBX unit bypassed. All listening was done with the Carver c-9 sonic holography circuit engaged. The Sumiko Blue Point and Denon DL 103r are both critically acclaimed moving coil cartridges available for less $300 that are generally compared to much more expensive cartridges.

The Denon is a low output cartridge which requires more gain correspondingly in the phono pre-amp section than the Sumiko. The low compliance (stiffer stylus) Denon DL 103R also is said to work better in higher mass tonearms. The Linn Basik seems to fit this requirement well.

Both cartridges seem to have a similar tonal balance, with good clarity and crisp highs compared to most any moving magnet cartridge I've tried. If your pre-amp can accomodate a moving coil cartridge, I think either cartridge is a better choice. However, this is where the similarities end between the Sumiko Blue Point and the Denon DL 103R. I've heard the Blue Point described as somewhat "analytical" sounding, which I would say is an accurate description. The presenation overall was not as smooth and absorbing as the Denon.

On the other hand, I believe the DL103R lived up to the highest praise I've seen accorded it. My vinyl records never sounded better. The sound stage, bass, dynamics, detail and the entire presentation overall was extrodinary. I found myself drawn into the music like never before. This was some of the best sonic rendering I've ever heard...period. Enough said.

If you are in the market for a good phono cartridge and your system can accomodate the DL 103R, get one now while still available. It is an exceptional device. I've heard rumors it has been discontinued but still appears to be available via audio cubes web site + some ebay-based providers.

Associated gear
Linn Axis Turntable
Carver C-9 pre-amp
Carver mt4.0t power amp
DNM Reson and Harmonic Technology Truthlink interconnects
Dynaudio Contour 1.3 Mk II speakers

Similar products
Sumiko Blue Point Phono Cartridge
128x128mapman
Post removed 
The chart doesn't say the mass of a Basik Plus exactly ( I may be missing something in identifying my tonearm model exactly), but it does list a Basik LVX at 12.5 grams mass and also lists a Basic LVX+ with no mass specification, so my tonearm appears to match the 12.5 gram mass tonearm best.

Is 12.5 grams considered high mass?

Does anyone know of a way to effectively increase the mass of a Linn Basik tonearm without causing any harm? I would do some experimenting if a recommended tweak were harmless to the table + arm and could be removed easily if needed.
12.5 grams would still be medium mass. On a side note: The compliance of the Denon is higher than usually quoted - running the Denon in a light JMW9 (7.7g) gave a measured resonance of around 11Hz and the Denon sounded better on the JMW9 than on heavier Rega arms, at least IMO (possibly the unipivot arm, or maybe I am getting tired of the Rega midbass).

Overall, I would say the compliance and resonance is not the main issue with the Denon although heavier arms do seem to result in a better sound. Good bearings are essential.

By the way: Nice review - I absolute love the Denon 103 line. Be careful though, after running a Denon DL103 for 10+ years it is difficult to switch to any other cart. An recommendations for upgrades for the DL103 hooked fanatic?
I have a 103R, and I set it up on a Linn Basik arm last night. I found that I have very little room to align the cartridge, since the cart is so big that the back inside corner hits the connector pins on the arm. I aligned the cart using a Stupid Protractor from Vinyl Engine, and I got it pretty close, but the cart still hangs off the end of the head shell a little. It's sounding pretty good, but I wish I had more room to tweak the angle. Any suggestions?

Devon
The fit to the headshell was tight on mine as well.

When I aligned the cartridge using the Linn provided template, the properly aligned cartridge did overhang the front by a millimeter or two. This appeared to be the correct alignment,and I do not notice any sonic deficiencies, so I'm not sure that overhang alone is necessarily a problem.