2. analog
  3. 1445997838

A new player in the quality Mono cartridge game

For awhile there, if you wanted a mono cart to get the most out your new mono Beatles collection, other mono reissues, or vintage mono LPs, there were the budget offerings from Grado, a big price gap, and then the more expensive good stuff. The elliptical mono Grado goes for around $150.

But now the Audio Technica AT MONO3/LP, a HOMC, is available in the US. The link goes to the official importer, LpGear, who prices this $299.99 cart at $189.99. However, I also found that this cart is available from Amazon for $112.65. Worried that the unofficial import puts your purchase at risk? For a mere $12 extra you can buy a 2-year protection warranty.

I ordered mine via Amazon Prime on Sat. Oct. 24 and it arrived today.

This thing is NICE! 1.2mV output, which is plenty, conical stylus (don't know if it's nude or not, but it *sounds* nude), tracking force range 1.5-2.5g. I'm breaking mine in at around 2g.

Even fresh out of the box, this cart's a revelation. I started with "Within You Without You" from the new Beatles Mono vinyl reissue. It's really something when you play a mono record with a cartridge that produces no signal in the vertical plane. The noise floor drops down to the indiscernible. In fact, even cueing the needle makes very little sound thru the speakers.

Everything on Sgt. Pepper's sounded richer, lusher, more distinct, more dynamic, with great treble extension and no hint of sibilance. I followed it with Analogue Productions' 3-LP 45 rpm remaster of Nat King Cole's "After Midnight." Fan-TASTIC! I thought Nat was in the room before, but the dynamics, transparency, and truth-in-timbre reached a height I hadn't heard on my rig up to now.

I finished my mini-audition with a *real* mono record, an original mono Columbia Masterworks pressing of "Grand Canyon Suite" performed by Eugene Ormandy and The Phily Phil. Again, smoother, quieter, more dynamics. It showed its age a little bit, but I think I could bring this 55-yr-old record close to the reissues with a steam cleaning. Even without it it was very satisfying.

Folks, if you have nothing but the new Beatles mono reissues and have an easy way to switch cartridges or set up a mono rig, this cart is so worth it.

Right now I have around 13 Beatles mono LPs, two Beach Boys reissues, the Nat King Cole, some old Columbia Masterworks and shaded dog Orthophonics, mono reissues of Prestige and Miles Davis LPs, and some mono pressings of '60s pop.

I'm thinking of separating all my mono vinyl into its own shelf so--when I mount the AT Mono3 LP--I don't have to sort through my entire collection to play the compatible LPs.

BTW, if you decide to go after this cartridge, make sure you get the AT MONO3/LP cartridge, which is for mono LPS, and *NOT* the AT MONO3/SP cartridge, which is for 78s.
johnnyb53
johnnyb53 OP
3,510 posts
 
Belyin: the thing is, this mono Audio Technica cartridge provides so much for so little, at least from Amazon. It lists at around $300, but you can get it from Amazon for $112.65. A replacement stylus for a mono Grado ME+ is $90; you might as well buy three Audio Technicas and set yourself up for a decade of playing mono LPs.

The other cartridges you mention cost more in one way or another. The Denon is twice as much. It has OFC copper, but the AT has PCOCC copper, a big step up in the most strategic place. The Ortofon SPU Mono is no doubt a great mono cart, but at around 8-1/2 times the price it should be.

That's why I'm nuts about the Audio Technica. It is a great value, almost a gift--a cannily built high output moving coil with a forgiving conical stylus and an overall enticing musical presentation for little more than a Shure M97xE.

I'm sure there are better mono carts, but none that can get within sniffing distance of the AT at $112.65.
oregonpapa's avatar
oregonpapa
4,867 posts
 
Johnny ...

I used to have a second turntable ... an old Technics with an SME arm. I used it to play 78's. No room for a second table at this time though.

Its really surprising how good mono records can sound. I have hundreds of mono jazz albums, vocals and some classical too. At times, with a good mono record playing, the thought crosses my mind ... "who needs stereo?" As we mono guys know, mono sometimes sounds much better than the label's stereo releases.

Well recorded 78's can be pretty amazing too. I have a copy of the West Coast jazz group "The Lighthouse All Stars" on a 78 rpm record that puts them right in the room. I used to demo it for guests just to show them how good 78's can sound. The record companies were still issuing 78's well into the 1950's. We used to buy them when I was a kid because they were cheap. Fifty cents each, brand new. It was this era that had the good sounding 78's. Man ... Joe Houston, Big Jay McNeely and Earl Bostic on 78's? To die for. *lol*
lewm
12,481 posts
 
Apart from the fact that I loathe Amazon, thanks for the heads up. I'd actually rather pay the extra money and buy from some other vendor, but LP Gear are not so meritorious, either. Anyway, does your preamplifier have a "mono" switch? Did you ever try it when playing mono LPs with a stereo cartridge? If anyone has done this experiment and then also heard a mono cartridge in his or her system, I would be interested to know which configuration was preferred. In theory, a stereo cartridge played through mono switching ought to be about the same as a mono cartridge, on mono LPs. At least, this is what I tell myself, since I don't yet own a mono cartridge.
johnnyb53 OP
3,510 posts
 
Lewm, I think I can shed some light on your questions.

No, my preamp does not have a mono switch.

Until last Tuesday, I've played my 30 or so mono LPs with a stereo cartridge,
the Audio Technica AT150MLX.

I only started playing these mono albums with this new AT mono cart for the
past six days. I have been giving heavy rotation to the Beatles and Nat King
Cole mono reissues plus vintage pressings.

Your "In theory, a stereo cartridge played through mono switching ought to
be about the same as a mono cartridge, on mono LPs" overlooks a couple of
things. Original mono pressings only have modulations in the horizontal
plane. Modern mono pressings are pressed like stereo pressings--horizontal
modulations for one channel, vertical modulations for the other channel.
When both channels have the same info and are played back on a stereo
cartridge, yes, you do get mono. However, the two channels will be slightly
out of sync unless the cartridge is *perfectly* aligned.

A mono cartridge can *track* in both planes, but only the horizontal
modulations are transmitted. This means there are no right/left phasing
issues and the noise floor is lower becausethe noise and accumulated dust
of the vertical channel transmits no sound.

Also, modern mono cartridges have a suspension that allows the cantilever
to move horizontally and vertically, probably so you don't inadvertently ruin a
stereo record. However, the vertical circuit is "dead." The needle moves
that way but makes no sound.

Another advantage with the AT MONO is that the stylus is conical (not so on
many mono cartridges), so overhang isn't so picky and tangential alignment
isn't so critical. With a stereo cartridge with a microline, Shibata, Fritz-Gyger,
etc. stylus the opposite is true--for best mono playback alignment needs to
be as close to perfect as possible. In fact, playing a stereo cartridge on a
modern mono record is a good tool for spotting alignment problems--and
also for subwoofer integration. I once played a mono Miles Davis reissue and
iit sounded like the music was coming from the left wall. I had to adjust the
azimuth to fix it.

The mono cartridge sound is very focused and free of any phasey artifacts
because it's playing only one track rather than merging two identical tracks
that are supposed to sound identical. With a mono cartridge, because only
one track is getting picked up, music from both speakers *is* identical.

For me, at $112.65 and a turntable with interchangeable headshells--even
for playing just 30 records or so--this was a no-brainer.
lewm
12,481 posts
 
I don't know about the particular AT cartridge under discussion, but many/most "modern" mono cartridges are merely stereo cartridges that are internally bridged to produce a mono signal. Mono cartridges thus constructed would therefore produce a signal, in fact, in response to vertical movements of the stylus that is canceled at the outputs. The result is very little different from using the mono switch on a preamplifier with a stereo cartridge playing a mono LP. Neither is "perfectly" mono. (I would not argue for a minute that either option is not superior to playing a mono LP with a stereo cartridge into a preamp set for stereo mode. That's easy to hear.) Admittedly, there are "true" mono cartridges out there; I think Ortofon, EMT, and Miyajima make examples, and probably others. I'd like to hear one of those.
More to discover