Headphone Listeners?


I'm at a bit of a crossroads in my system building, and I'm looking for input from anyone who spends a substantial amount of time listening to headphones--and anyone who can't stand them for particular reasons, too. My current system is modest, as are my means, and having gotten tired of "upgrading" in incremental half-measures I've decided that I want to start gradually building around better gear that's worth keeping. The problem is that I'll be saving a long time to get the gear I want, and in the meantime an excellent headphone rig--and the sound I'm going for--is much more in reach.

I auditioned a pair of Sennheiser HD600s with the Antique Sound Lab MG DT OTL mkIII and LOVED it. It's exactly the sound I want: rich midrange, SET magic, a full bottom end, and slightly laid back highs. The listening I did was a revelation, but unfortunately brief. I'd like to hear from anyone who's spent a satisfying length of time using headphones for most of their critical listening. Since I occasionally use a pair of AKG K501s through my amp's headphone jack and find them a bit too up-front and fatiguing, I worry about listening fatigue being higher with headphones in general. Through speakers or headphones, I listen at 60 to 80 dB max. In my short listen to the Senn/ASL combo I felt I could listen for hours. What are the down-sides?

For context: My current system is an NAD C325BEE with KEF Q15 speakers, fed by a Sony Playstation One, Marantz changer, and Technics/Shure combo through a Cambridge 540P. I've paid a lot of attention to setup and as much room treatment as my wife will go for. The sound is basically satisfying, and aside from an occasional "hardness" in its sound that might still be the room its sins are mostly of omission. If I do go the headphone route now, I'll set it up separately and probably live with the system as stands for another year or more before I begin to upgrade it piece by piece.

If it helps, I listen to about 60% small combo jazz, 20% classical (evenly split between small and large scale), and 20% rock (mostly indie). Thanks in advance for sharing your experience. Are headphones another half-measure or one path to the promised land?
ablang
What would be your source(s) for headphone listening? When you say it will be separate, do you mean that the headphone rig will have its own dedicated source(s) or will use the same sources as listed above?

Your thinking is sound - a decent headphone setup will take you farther down the road of "audiophile" listening for considerably less money than chasing other incremental upgrades elsewhere in your system. The HD600s paired with any number of dedicated headphone amps will yield huge dividends in listening pleasure. Spend some time on www.headfi.org. My experience with the 600s is all positive - great sound and very comfortable. The HD580s are very near the same performance for a little less.

FWIW - keep the NAD and KEF gear. Really good values! I assume that the Technics is sound (is it a 1200?) and the cartridge is an m97xe - there is room for improvement with your phono pre without too much of an additional expenditure. Search www.audioasylum.com (vinyl) for recommendations.

Depending on how much you listen to digital, there are many different directions to go (standalone player, DAC, server) - but suffice to say that there is better than a Sony PlayStation for not alot of moolah.

Good luck and happy listening!
Your 501s will benefit a ton from a good headphone amp. I've got the K701s, Audio Technica W5000s and Ultimate Ears Triple.fi 10 Pros, all driven by a Woo Audio WA6 with a Holland GZ34 rectifier tube.

Lots of people love the Senns, so you'll be in good company. I haven't heard the ASL amp. If it's up in the $600 range, then you need to consider the Woo also. If you buy some Senns and an amp, then keep the 501s for a while to see if the new amp doesn't smooth them out.

Also, AKGs and most cans need 100-300 hours of break in. Use your cheap Headphone Out circuit to break them in, if you haven't already done so. The character will totally change in many cases. My Audio Techicas sounded like pure crap until I got over 100-hours on them. Most people say the AKGs need up to 300-hours.

Your ultimate goal will be to get your speaker system up to the standard of your headphone rig. Most of us think that speakers are superior, but a price point of up to 10X for equivalent performance.

Dave
Thanks for your responses. To fill out my options as I'm seeing them now: I agree, Dave, that ultimately getting my speaker setup up to the quality of the headphone setup might wind up being my goal. And from what you both say I suspect I might be best off buying the tube headphone amp first (the Woo is new to me, but I just checked out the website and it sure LOOKS great) and getting the most out of my AKGs, with an upgrade to the Sennheisers later. I've given the AKGs at least a hundred hours, but I'm certainly willing to believe that the right amp and some more break-in could fill them out.

Soulbrass: My plan at this point has been to set up the headphone amp in another room with its own dedicated digital source. I'll probably start with the Playstation since I have it on hand. My feeling about the NAD and KEF combo has been generally the same as yours, and I especially found myself surprised at the capability of the amp and speakers when I got into vinyl--that they were able to convey its character so well. My Technics is the SL-D2 model, but the Shure is the M97xE. You may be right that the phono pre and digital source might be my biggest limiters just now--so though I know I'm on the speakers forum maybe I can ask you for the budget digital sources you'd suggest. I heard the ASL amp and Sennheisers with a Pioneer Elite DVD player, though I'm not sure of the model or price, and it impressed me as a part of the combo. Source might be the second or third step if I do decide to pursue the headphone rig. Were I to use the new source in my main rig instead, could I then hook up the headphone amp to the tape monitor loop?

Thanks again.