Theta Dreadnaught as a two channel amp

Bigtee, yes perhaps I shouldn't draw conclusions on matters of which I know little about. And also yes, the dread's midrange was super pure and liquid. The amp seems to not struggle with the sound at all, it sort of emerged, but also it was as if it was even trying to re-create any power from the deep end.

I have read about the global negative feedback, and perhaps this is exactly what is happening. I want that midrange, but WITH the bottom end.

I have never heard a Belles, so I cannot comment there.

Thanks.

"under price range that can smoke it is the BEL Mk IV or Mk V amp. (Then again, the BEL smokes most things...) "

What company are you talking about Bel Canto?

Agisthos,

Brown Electronic Labs (BEL) model 1001 MKIV or MKV

Bigtee, I am using the Dreadnaught I, how much more bottom end do you think the Dread II would deliver?

The Dread II sounds more powerful overall-no doubt about that. Sounds more than 25/ch more. The bass is definitely stronger overall. It is a little more dynamic. I think it is aimed more at home theater and its requirements. I must say that the better bottom end, power and dynamics of the Dread II is offset by not being quite as musical overall. I think the Dread I has a little better midrange which fits into the realm of my priorities better overall. The Dread II is certainly a good amp and if I didn't have the I, I'd buy the II. It certainly would serve my purpose about as well. I use Vandersteen's and the bottom is taken care of by sub drivers. So, it's not an issue with me as it would be with some. Hope this helps and if you decide to sell your Dread I, let me know.