Is there a worthy 6922 presently made?


Why hasn't any tube manfacturer designed a good sounding 6922 tube? The paucity of decent designs only fuels the exorbitant price gouging the tube dealers are doing with NOS 6922/6DJ8.

I think it is pretty universally accepted among tube fans that the Sovtek 6922 is a dependable & strong tube, but a sterile, thin, & dead sounding device. Some have praised the JJ 6922, while others have proclaimed it rather mediocre, and some have blown up their amplifiers, like an ARC owner who burned out parts of his VT-100's circuit board when attempting to substitute the JJ's for the stock Sovteks in the input stage.

Sovtek's owner, New Sensor, has come out with a "new" 6922 in the form of an Electroharmonix 6922, with claims it is significantly better than the Sovtek. But some have said it is nearly the identical tube and sounds nearly identical. Audio Research claims it is a better tube, but.....

Why hasn't Svetlana designed a 6922? Or someone else? We are left with two tubes made by the same manufacturer, and one from Czechoslovakia. That's it! Any thoughts or experiences?
kevziek
I have a couple pairs of the premium Electroharmonix 6922's I got from Audible Illusions, for my L1 pre. For my application, I think it is a very good sounding tube and is supposed to be pretty rugged.

FWIW,
Hey Matty,

I know you'd been looking at a lot of different preamps over the last six months. I see that you're hanging on to the AI L1. How do you like it?

Are the Electroharmonix still being made?

did you decide on a speaker cable?

Dean
Hi guys. I hate snobbery. Having said that, the electroharmonix 6922's are garbage compared to most early 60's tubes. No comparision.
Imin2u,

You may be right about the comparison but the price of the EH 6922 is much better than 60's tubes, yes?

The "faults" of the EH 6922 I think are probably more of what they don't do as compared to what they do (system synergy also being an issue.

Regards,