2. speakers
  3. 124344-39874

Wilson Sophia 1 vs vandersteen 2ce

Hi, this may be a no-brainer but I'm looking for some reassurance. I'm looking for a substantial speaker upgrade over my 2ce's. I'm looking at used Sophia 1s. I also have the vandy sub. The rest of by system is :
vtl preamp
belles 150 v2
vpi Classic 1 with dynavector karat.
thanks!!!!
128x128sinewave93

Showing 10 responses by gdnrbob

gdnrbob
4,409 posts
 
I am a Vandersteen user (3a sigs), and I heard the Wilson Sabrina's at a local dealer. I never heard of Wilson before, but I was really impressed by the sound they produced, so much so, that if a pair of Sophias or WattPuppy7/8's at the right price come up, I would buy them.
The Belles should have enough power (125 watt/channel, I think) to drive the Wilson's-unless you have a huge room/or like you music super loud.
gdnrbob
4,409 posts
 
Congrats sinewave!
Let us know what you think about the Wilson's. I, myself, would like to buy a pair, should an opportunity to buy a pair at a reasonable cost come up.
As far as cables, I think Transparent has been high on the Wilson list.
gdnrbob
4,409 posts
 
Nice to hear you are liking the Sophia's. Have almost the same gear as you did, and was thinking about a Wilson upgrade route.

gdnrbob
4,409 posts
 
russmaleartist, I don't think this post should be part of this discussion. If you feel the need to express your opinions regarding the transient nature of 'the best', you should create a new thread.
Sinewave asked for our opinions regarding the Wilson's, and we gave it.
I am glad he is happy with his choice- And, I envy him not only for having the money to buy the Wilson's, but also for having such good taste in speakers.
gdnrbob
4,409 posts
 
Thanks Samhar, for reviving the thread.
I, too, would like to know how those Sophia's sound compared to the Vandersteen.
gdnrbob
4,409 posts
 
Ooohh, I am jealous....
Perhaps those Wilson's will be my next move.
gdnrbob
4,409 posts
 
Guys!
Will you please let sinewave enjoy his purchase?
We all have our preferences, but why go out of your way to throw a monkey wrench into someone else's choice.
I, for one, hopes he enjoys the Wilson's. 
BTW, I have the Vandy's, and enjoy them. I have heard the Sabrina's- which made me think Wilson's might be a future purchase-(used, of course).
gdnrbob
4,409 posts
 
Stewart, I now understand what you were driving at.
And, I can understand the disappointment you must have felt having to go back to the Vandy's. 
But, I want Sinewave to have a honeymoon with his new speakers. Should time reveal any shortcomings, then you and any others with similar experiences should comment.
I say this because I have been in the same situation. 
gdnrbob
4,409 posts
 
Really, Stewart, 'me and any others',  'irregardless'?
Sure, you can comment.
Though perhaps by using such phrases and that non-existant 'word', the OP will, hopefully, give your comments the weight they deserve.


gdnrbob
4,409 posts
 
Stewart, perhaps you should read Merriam-Webster:
Usage Discussion of irregardless

Irregardless originated in dialectal American speech in the early 20th century. Its fairly widespread use in speech called it to the attention of usage commentators as early as 1927. The most frequently repeated remark about it is that “there is no such word.” There is such a word, however. It is still used primarily in speech, although it can be found from time to time in edited prose. Its reputation has not risen over the years, and it is still a long way from general acceptance. Use regardless instead.

As far as 'the honeymoon' goes, 
being kind and letting others enjoy their purchases/decisions shouldn't have a time limit. Sure, you have your opinion. But, when it comes to negativity, we should all think before writing.

More to discover