I understand the reasoning for the Perfect SET 15 vs Perfect SET, but I don’t know the reasoning behind the 2-10 Perfect SET. The specs between the Perfect SET and 2-10 Perfect SET are nearly identical.
The only difference I can see between the Perfect SET and 2-10 Perfect SET beyond the obvious differences in woofers, is front vs. rear porting (which I suppose would affect placement proximity to the front wall).
Can someone who has asked this of Eric explain it here?
@tvad,
What millercarbon said.
The Perfect SET is designed specifically for low power SET amps.
I talk to Tammy today and she told me The Perfect Set 2-10 it is a 8 Ohm speaker. But she’s not sure. Sorry, Eric was in the paint shop when I called.
The Perfect SET - designed and optimized for ’single-ended triode’ amplification between 8-12 Watts RMS
The Perfect SET is 2 or 3 way?
Minimum input requirement: 1 Watt RMS
Proprietary controlled directivity - high frequency performance
Patented 2 gram total moving mass 7 tweeter poly-cell midrange array
8 Ohm
(1) 12" Ulfberht Transducer - Tuned/Timed for single-ended triode’ amplification between 8-12 Watts RMS
300 Watts maximum power handling
$1800
The Perfect Set 2-10 - Designed and optimized for all tube amplification rated between 12-120 Watts RMS
The Perfect SET 2-10 is a 3 way
Proprietary controlled directivity - high frequency performance
Patented 2 gram total moving mass 7 tweeter poly-cell midrange array
? Ohm
(2) Pendragon 10" transducers
400 Watt power handling
$2000
I’m just gonna take a guess that The Perfect Set 2-10 is better at handling both low to high watt tube amplification and low to high watt solid state?
Is the (1) 12" Ulfberht Transducer superior to the (2) Pendragon 10" transducers?
Eric's Perfect Set Introduction | Tekton Design: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fHm6dNSQs4k
Tekton 2-10 Perfect Set speakers: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=37dH2UJ8kaA