2. amps-preamps
  3. 148400-87444

What is proper ratio of money spent on amp/preamp/integrated vs speakers? 1:1?

Lately I'm finding more of a difference in SQ as a move up the chain in the amp/preamp/integrated market and not so much if I try to upgrade speakers.  Plus, buying and selling (and shipping) speakers is a PITA.  But having just upgraded from Devialet D200 to the dual mono D400 and loving it, it feels odd having $8000 (I'm in the used market almost exclusively) worth of power running $4000 worth of speakers, Dynaudio Contour 30's. 

I'm now wanting to upgrade again to the Expert Pro 440, but then we're taking about $10,000 and even more of a skewed ratio.
What is the proper ratio?  Thoughts?
mjmcubfn
donvito
393 posts
 
It’s Da Bronx in my neck of the woods!
auxinput
2,920 posts
 
I think the ratio between element costs becomes less of an issue once you get to a certain level of equipment, such as pieces that are $2k or more.  Have a $10k amp power some $2k bookshelves is not out of bounds of consideration (though the bookshelves could definitely be a weak link in the system now).  Have a $4k amp power some $500 tower speakers will definitely be a less of a good idea (though not out of bounds either).  It just depends on how you want to spend your money, but lower cost items will usually be weak links.
oicu812's avatar
oicu812
110 posts
 
I look for hand me downs, and feel blessed when I run across a bargain.
Speakers are just important as the amp, matching them up is key.
michaelgreenaudio's avatar
michaelgreenaudio
1,019 posts
 

I've never felt that $$$=sound. It's a very strange concept to me in regards to parts of the audio chain.

Michael Green

pokey77
1,260 posts
 
There is no ratio of $$ per component. It is all about component/speaker synergy. My amp/pre amp cost nearly twice as much as my speakers, but it works tremendously well.
More to discover