Vienna Mahler and Dunlavy SCIV/A comparison


Has anyone here make the comparison of both speaker? I used the Dunlavy but recently there a great deal on Mahler from one distributor (5000 US$ on demo unit and age around 2 years, Bi-wire version). I just want to try but want to have your opinion on some specific area.

1. Sonic performance
2. Ease of set up. My room not quite big and I heard that Mahler can creat bass problem in the smaller room.
3. Ease of drive. Can drive with 100 watts/channel or require muscle amp?

Appreciate your comment.
chalitr

Showing 1 response by downunder

Chaltir. Raquel is spot re the mahlers, tube amps (most at least) need not apply.
I am sure your plinus will drive them fine. I have just bought cj prem350 after a quite long series of amp auditions. It would seem that amps with bi-polar output sections have the greater bass control.

have a look at the stereophile archives and Robert Deutsch does a comparison between Mahlers and Dunlavy SC-IV/A's.

The mahlers do need a little juice to come alive, but they can play as loud as you want to play them

5k sounds like a pretty good price considering you will also have full warranty.

have fun