To Wavelngth USB DAC users: Best ripping/playback?


I recently configured a computer music server using a Mac mini and a Wavelength Cosecant USB DAC. I use iTunes for ripping & playback. In iTunes I use Apple Lossless and select the error correction option.

I've read many posts on this site & Audioasylum about people jumping through hoops to use EAC to rip, then other software to compress and then playback with Foobar. I'm a bit skepitcal about these posts as most posters are using Windows and many of them are using the computer sound card instead of investing in a USB DAC.

So to all of you Wavelength users that have figured out that there are no shortcuts and you have to use a decent USB DAC for sound quality, has anyone done any A/B tests between Mac based iTunes (using Lossless & error correction) and a Windows based ripping/playback method?

I've read that we should expect a well configured computer music server to equal or better any CD transport/DAC combo. My results are very good, but my computer music server doesn't equal a world class CD transport such as the AMR CD-77 and I'm wondering if I need to consider my ripping/playback method.

Thanks in advance.
cycles2

Showing 1 response by jwmazur

All I can tell you is that I am using Windows Media Player and use Exact Audio Copy to rip my CD's to the hard drive. I gave my son an Apple I Mac for his birthday a few weeks ago. He insatlled the I Mac on my system and called me to proclaim how great it sounded. He had ripped much of his music to the hard drive already. I don't use a Wavelength DAC however,the DAC is a Burwen using a software plug-in called the Bobcat.

I came home and listened to the CD player in the I Mac going into the DAC in my system. I was unimpressed. He then urged me to rip the selections onto the I Mac's hard drive because it sounded so much better. I came back a few days later and did just that. When I fired up the system, I had the left channel with no sound due to a bad connection on the speaker lugs. I could tell even with the left channel out that it was seemimgly more vivid. I can't tell you what his settings were in the Apple, but what I heard was more density to the music that made imaging more palpable once the left channel was restored. The highs were a smidge more pleasing to me using my Windows-based system but it also had a sound that was a little more thin than that of the I Mac. I also think the sound on my friend's system is pretty special and he uses a Mac Mini.

Based upon my observations using the same DAC with both OS, my nod goes to the Apple.