To Pre or not to Pre? Here is my take


I remember reading in many places that the best preamp was no preamp.
Finally in a position to test that theory
Equipment is Esoteric sa-50 player, audio research ls preamp, bat vk600 power amp.
So I let everything warm up for an hour or so and then played some Halestorm through the system, for anybody who is not familiar with Mz. Hale, she is similar to a smoother Bonnie Tyler with more range! Her band has some great bass guitar and drum work as well so a nice little workout.
After 5 or 6 tracks I changed over to powering the bat direct from the esoteric using the same cardas xlr interconnects.
It only took a couple of tracks to confirm
I just did not like this sound, bass was much thinner, soundstage not as wide, vocals not as smokey for want of a better description of Mz. Hales style.
Hooked the ls2 back and joy was restored!

What does this tell me?
That absolutely the ls preamp is adding its own sonic signature to the mix, in theory that equates to probably a more "dirty" sound but to me this was the sound I preferred.
Now obviously no 2 people listening to the same gear are going to hear the same thing, its impossible!
However playing MY music on MY gear the sound going through the ls2 preamp was the sound that I wanted to hear, end of story.
Oh trust me its not just value perception, I sort of WANTED the sound to be better without the ls2 preamp as I could have then sold it and spent the money elsewhere! 
I know there will be lots of people who can spout theories to prove I am full of it but the only judge of the sound of your own system worth worrying about is yourself!
128x128uberwaltz

Showing 10 responses by georgehifi

But most sources use them whether we like it or not.
Sorry Ralph, but I do many mods to hi-end later model dac/cdp's and most good ones are direct coupled. It's just mainly the ones that have tube output stages that are capacitor coupled. The majority of good s/s ones, are direct coupled.

Cheers George 
This is why 99% of everything out there uses coupling caps.
In tube equipment yes, but try to tell designers like Dan Agostino, John Curl, Jeff Rowland etc etc. that. They are firmly in the direct coupled camp, from go to whoa.

I've seen many problems with pieces of even expensive equipment that is capacitor coupled, in that one the cap is not big enough in uF(microfarads), two they use poor quality caps, three sometimes they use electrolytic caps, even I've seen bi-polar electrolytics used.
Still the best cap is no cap. 

Cheers George
The issue is that the output impedance can vary with frequency
Yes of course it can, especially if capacitor coupled. (best cap is no cap)
This is why my system is direct coupled from dac convertor chips output pins all the way to the speakers, with dc servos at each stage taking care of any dc offset.

Cheers George  
The source impedance is not always linear with frequency- quite often it is considerably higher at 20Hz than it is at 1000 Hz (look up the measurements on various CD players
This is also just as true with just as many preamps outputs, not just sources, especially tube ones also some solid state ones.
Today many sources have just as strong/drive (low output impedance) as most preamps have. (excluding sources with tube output stages).

Cheers George
uberwaltz


Before you spend big bucks on a newer AR pre on a hope it will be better than what you have now, try this with the volume on the Esoteric full up or if it has the fixed output. For $49, and it’s refundable as well.
http://schiit.com/products/sys

Or the passive or tube one, also refundable
http://schiit.com/products/saga.


Or the balanced, passive tube active, or solid state active.
http://schiit.com/products/freya


Cheers George
George, the perfect recording has not been made yet and probably won’t be made in our lifetimes
I like to hear my best recordings as they come from the dac, and if the bad ones don't sound so good, so be it, at least I'm not colouring both.


If no preamp works for you, great, but active preamps may work better for some others. In fact, I’m sure they can.
 Like I said before, some may like a certain colouration a preamp gives to their system. And that they all sound different. It's up to the owner/buyer of a preamp to get the one with the right colouration to address their problem.
I myself like to address the problem directly and fix it, without the need to hunt for the right preamp to colour the problem.
 
None sound like a straight piece of wire, otherwise all would sound the same as going direct.

Cheers George

 
and you can sometimes have a bad match. In a case like this, using a preamp may be a less colored option.

OP: " It only took a couple of tracks to confirm
I just did not like this sound, bass was much thinner, soundstage not as wide, vocals not as smokey for want of a better description of Mz. Hales style. Hooked the ls2 back and joy was restored!"

When I read that statement, it sounds like your system is doing a better job at reconstructing the original recording with the preamp in the chain, than without. At this level we can only speculate, but in your case using the preamp may be the more "accurate" solution.
In that OP’s statement you quoted. He did have a perfect impedance/drive match when he went direct, and he wasn’t "bit stripping" because he was at 80% of the digital domain VC.
So it comes down to that he preferred the "colouration/distortion" of the active preamp that aided in fixing a system or room imbalance, and not because the preamp was more "accurate" to what was coming out of the source.

Cheers George
What does this tell me?
That absolutely the ls preamp is adding its own sonic signature to the mix, in theory that equates to probably a more "dirty" sound but to me this was the sound I preferred.

Two things going on here, that need to be addressed.
 
1: You may have a system/room problem where the preamps sonic signature (colouration) is doing a cover job on, as the Esoteric direct into the Bat has a better impedance/drive than the LS2 has.

2: When you went direct, your Bat's input sensitivity is just 1.5v in for full power out, and your Esoteric is 2.2v out.
This means your digital domain volume control in the Esoteric must have been turned down quite low.
It's well known that digital volume controls "Bit Strip" the music (you lose resolution) when they are turned down below 75% of full.  No matter what the manufacturers advertise.
You would have been better off doing this comparison with the Esoteric full up and a cheap $49 Schiit Sys doing the volume in the analogue domain.

 http://schiit.com/products/sys

Cheers George
Then you have digital gods like Thorsten Loesch designer of all AMR digital stuff saying this.
" Turn down the volume even the tiniest bit using the digital volume control and the sound quality to a massive hit. "

Cheers George
George, Active preamps can also be fixing poor recordings

I don’t think so, the "perfect" active preamp is said to sound like a straight piece of wire, it should not add or take away from what the source is giving, but that perfect preamp is yet to be made.

Cheers George