stupid question about sources, amps, and loudness


Okay, so I really should know this, but I don't, so your help is most appreciated.

My speakers are a fairly tough load to drive 86db efficient, 6 Ohms nominal.

That suggests that I need reasonably powerful amplifier(s). Currently I use solid state amps rated at 100 WPC.

The amps are Kharma MP150s. They drive the speakers quite loud, although they do start to "flatten out" at 95 db (which is much louder than I typically listen, even when I've turned it up).

I have some issues with not having enough range of volume control either with a pre-amp or with a CPD with a volume control -- that is to say, if I turn the volume control much past 10 or 11 it is too loud.

I know that I can use attenuators to fix the volume control problem, but that they also can have sonic consequences.

Here's the question: less powerful amps are NOT the answer right? It's input sensitivity. Right?

So, if for example, I am thinking of trying tube amps, I still need to be mindful of the difficult to drive speakers and thus need to get some pretty beefy tube amps (i.e., 100 WPC+). Because less powerful tube amps won't have enough current to drive the speakers effectively.

BUT: I would want amps with a lower input sensitivity?

Do I have this right?

Thanks for clearing the cobwebs for me.

--dan
dgaylin

Showing 1 response by xti16

I had a similar problem when I use balanced ic's. Except I could not even get to 11 o'clock which is why I bought the rca version.

As far as tube power I had a Bryston B100 rated @ 100w into 8ohm and 180w into 4ohm. My speakers are Dyn C1's rated at 85 db but a steady 4ohm. Then I bought the Octave V70SE rated at 70w into 4ohm. The Octave has everything all over the Bryston especially the control of instruments and vocals. 2 things I would consider when looking at a tubes is a soft start to make the tubes last longer and a good output protection circuit (all tubes will eventually fail) and you don't want to have to have it repaired after a tube failure.