Should Manufacturer's Tell Us More About Crossovers


I recently purchased a pair of Vandersteen 1ci 's.

Their (his) philosophy is 15% cabinets 85% internals to produce a time & phase aligned speaker.

I know they've stood the test of time; so I was satisfied with their philosophy,  track record and explanation that the crossover is 1st order and the speaker terminals hook directly to it.

But I wish I could know more, both from Vandersteen and other manufacturers about what is on the inside.

Am I just obsessing? Do others feel the same way?
128x128jimspov

Showing 2 responses by erik_squires

Well, of course we all want to know more. :) But it's like looking behind the curtain in the Wizard of Oz. No manufacturer wants customers looking at part cost as the measure of the product. They want you to look at things like Modernity, and Advancement and Brand. 

It depends though.  Some makers like Magico have their crossovers built entirely out of top line parts from Mundorf.  Others like Wilson put their crossovers in pots to make it harder to reverse engineer them, or see just how cheap they are. 

It is also true that a little crossover knowledge is a dangerous thing. All sorts of misconceptions and myths take hold and you have fools  comparing crossovers by the number of parts, or whether a crossover has a Zobel or not.   On the other side of the spectrum, I wish reviewers actually evaluated the crossovers themselves, they would find they have been subjected to quite a bit of trickery themselves.  
And you are not obsessing, but perhaps you need to build your own to sate your curiosity?  Try my free plans for the LM-1

Maybe you'll get hooked and decide DIY is the only way to go. :)