SabrinaX vs JA Perspective2 Graphene


Has anyone compare / heard the SabrinaX and JA Perspective 2? 

Looking at the measurements, SabrinaX could be somewhat bright and have a recessed mid. Which speakers do you like more of? And which one would be easier to drive?

SabrinaX: 

JA measurements: 

 

128x128panerai557

Showing 4 responses by joc3021

I owned perspective 2's for a few years.  Very good speakers. Moved on because my room is large and I couldn't get the scale and bottom end I wanted (I:m anti subwoofer). Went back to open baffle/dipole which is my preferred sound. If you have a small/medium sized room and want a dynamic speaker design (conventional drivers in a box), they work great.  Very smooth, musical and non fatiguing.

My room is about 16 x 30, Too much for the Joseph's for what I wanted. Using big spatials, am able to get them well away from walls. Sounds great to me.

I have x4 ultras. Bass is huge: deep,fast, tight and detailed. Speakers must be positioned optimally for this. Mine are 4 feet from back wall and about 3 from the side wall. Mids are good, detailed and clean without edge or brightness. I would say the Joseph's mids are a bit more rounded and human sounding, one of their strengths is their naturalness in this region. Spatials highs are phenomenal. I'm a big fan of the AMT driver. No conventional tweeter sounds as smooth, extended and detailed to me as this does. Scale is huge. Very immersive and enveloping (this is big for me, and conventional speakers don't do this in my experience). The dipole design and open baffle dispersion pattern have a lot to do with this. The Joseph's sound way smaller and constrained (as do all conventional designs). Getting rid of the box changes everything. Not everybody's flavor, but I can't go back.

I have x4 ultras. Bass is huge: deep,fast, tight and detailed. Speakers must be positioned optimally for this. Mine are 4 feet from back wall and about 3 from the side wall. Mids are good, detailed and clean without edge or brightness. I would say the Joseph's mids are a bit more rounded and human sounding, one of their strengths is their naturalness in this region. Spatials highs are phenomenal. I'm a big fan of the AMT driver. No conventional tweeter sounds as smooth, extended and detailed to me as this does. Scale is huge. Very immersive and enveloping (this is big for me, and conventional speakers don't do this in my experience). The dipole design and open baffle dispersion pattern have a lot to do with this. The Joseph's sound way smaller and constrained (as do all conventional designs). Getting rid of the box changes everything. Not everybody's flavor, but I can't go back.