Revel Gems v1 vs Krell Lat 2's


I am looking at getting a pair of monitor speakers for my system. My budget is $3000.00 to $4000.00. I have been looking at the Revel Gems version 1 and the Krell Lat 2's for awhile now and I cannot decide on which to purchase. I have read just about everything available on them but that only gets you so far. Never having heard the Krells and only trying to remember what the Gems sound like from 8 years ago is difficult. I would greatly appreciate any advice from the Audiogon crowd regarding these speakers.

My system for running the speakers will be:

Harman Kardon HK990 Integrated amp. 150/300 watts 8/4ohm.
(This Integrated sounds better than some I have owned at twice the price)

Harman Kardon HD990 cd player

Kimber Kable Monocle XL speaker cables
Kimber Kable PK10 Palladian powerkords

Furman IT-Reference 15 power conditioner.

I would also consider the Totem Acoustics Mani-2 signatures and the Sonus Faber Cremona Auditor M's.

Thanks,
Brandon
Ag insider logo xs@2xbrandonosman23

Showing 1 response by scoutdog

Hello Brandon,
I own a pair of the lat-2 -- they are great speakers and I have no problems with the sound. They will give you a great clean sound (not missing a thing) and can be played louder than most speakers (If you need loud) -- Their solid machined enclosures are remarkable . I won't tell you (or argue that they are better than all your other choices) but they are very very good speakers. The thing about them is they do not produce very much bass (As Krell designed them)-- you will need a very good subwoofer with them, but their sound is world class (hard to beat) -- you will suffer from nothing except the lower bass region (I'am guessing around 80hz and below, even though Krell list it at around 48 hz--)but Monitors (all you have listed will require a subwoofer) are great for smaller spaces. The krells will fill even a large room with great clear sound whether its rock, classical, jazz, or hip hop -- as long as you have a great subwoofer and associated electronics upstream.
I would choose the Krells again over all the other monitors just because of their sound and build quality -- I use a JL Subwoofer with my pair. My other electronics consist of Krell KPS-28c player; Krell KCT Pre-amp; and Krell power amps (200c and evo 300) all cast system. I think your harmon kardon is definately a great choice for the electronics and with the Krells you would do well (You can build on these with your other components and know your speakers are not the problem for better sound)-- I also will say the revels are just as good if not better in the lower regions -- I love Revel products -- I don't think you have made any bad choices, I will agree with the other gentleman about his observations(Tmsorosk). At least you are asking -- Great Conversation topic.
One more thing about the Krells I have noticed -- I generally need to listen to them a little louder to get the disappearing effect/full sound stage/depth intergration -- Low level listening/Late night volume is not a strong suit for these speakers they do need a little power to come to life but when they do -- you are at world class sound.

A little note I have a sony es receiver I hooked up to the krells and they drive the speakers fine but I do notice a litte "sizzle" at the top end on certain recordings -- I know its the receiver (sony es 120 watts)not able to reproduce clearly the top end of what the krells are capable of producing. (with my krell system I hear eveything). I like Harmon Kardon better and do believe your receiver will be able to reproduce the sound better over the whole frq range than the Sony es.

My points about the krells -- Need a subwoofer and need a little volume for them to come to life.
Hope this helps
scoutdog