Passive Preamps? Anyone?


Will kind folks point me in the direction of some really good passive preamps, or really good, small (1-2) input active pre's? I'm thinking about trying a new DAC that does not come with volume control, so, alas, I need a good pre. Thanks!
sammie

Showing 5 responses by dgarretson

There is a long thread on DIY forum on the Lightspeed passive attenuator, which is sold commercially by georgehifi (indentified throughout the thread.) His design is based on optocoupler resistors, as formerly used in the Melos photentiometer volume control and more recently, apparently, in a Dart Zeel $20K preamp. The design is not easily adaptable to a balanced system, but if you are running single ended, this may be the most transparent(and inexpensive) passive.

http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?s=ec5a46642aff33baa33bfcf39e01cf07&threadid=80194&perpage=25&pagenumber=61
Incidently, toward the end of the above Lightspeed thread, Nelson Pass contributes schematics for a buffered passive that employs optocoupler resistors. I don't know whether he is currently selling product based on this design. My read is that sonics of the AU$500 Lightspeed passive should equal or surpass the optical volume control in the $23K DartZeel NHB-18S.
He keeps a low profile; emailing him through that forum is probably the best way.
Clio, I acquired the LDR piece parts, but abandoned the project due to problems getting LDRs to track closely in a high-impedance volume control for a balanced tube preamp. I've been waiting on Unixman from that thread to complete a rather complex digital control system that would resolve this issue. But assuming you need a single-ended passive of around 10K impedance, the Lightspeed should do fine. Looking forward to your findings.
To find eight closely matched LDRs as needed for a balanced passive, requires measuring & sorting through many dozens of pieces. The task is much simpler with a single-ended passive. Only two matched pairs of LDRs are necessary for a two channel SE passive, and variation in matching between L and R channel LDRs is noncritical. In contrast, in a balanced configuration, even small variations in LDR matching will produce poor common mode noise rejection. George understands these devices well and has probably been wise to steer clear of balanced configurations.

For those unfamiliar with the technology, an LDR is a photosensitive variable resistor, whose resistance is controlled by an adjacent LED. The volume pot on the passive preamp sends a variable control voltage to the LEDs, which determines the light intensity applied to the variable resistors. Two LDR elements per channel in a series/shunt arrangement, provide all the functionality of an expensive ladder-type attenuator based on conventional resistors. Apart from being simpler than a conventional ladder attenuator, the LDR attenuator is better insofar as there are no switch contacts in the signal path. Moreover, the sound of LDR resistors is reportedly as transparent as the best conventional resistors. Finally, as the control pot is not in the signal path, the chosen pot may be of the cheapest variety and have no impact on sound. So it's a win-win of simplicity, economy, & performance as seldom found in audio.