NAD 372 is better than 326BEE in terms of bass definition at lowever volume due to more wattage.
NAD 372 is just a bit better than 326BEE in terms of transparency but you have to pay a few hundreds $$$ more for that improvement.
I have used my 326BEE to drive my GF's Dynaudio DM 2-10 and JBL S-38 with ease. IMO, the NAD 326BEE is very refined, noticeably more refined than its predecessor 320BEE.
I like the newer 326BEE more after I replaced the cheap factory metal bars with the Audioquest Copperhead Preamp jumper cables.
Your Dynaudio Contour 1.3mk is probably not efficient and will not sound as loud as my GF's Dynaudio DM 2-10 or my JBL S-38.
And thus you may want to get the 372 or its replacement 375 to make your Dynaudio Contour 1.3mk sounds good at any listening level.
I talked to Dynaudio and they recommended me the NAD 372 for my GF's Dynaudio DM 2-10 and indeed they sound great together.
If you have more $$$, by all means, get a better amp.
My preferences for Dynaudio speakers are either NAD (low-fi) or Sim Audio (real hi-fi)
NAD 372 is just a bit better than 326BEE in terms of transparency but you have to pay a few hundreds $$$ more for that improvement.
I have used my 326BEE to drive my GF's Dynaudio DM 2-10 and JBL S-38 with ease. IMO, the NAD 326BEE is very refined, noticeably more refined than its predecessor 320BEE.
I like the newer 326BEE more after I replaced the cheap factory metal bars with the Audioquest Copperhead Preamp jumper cables.
Your Dynaudio Contour 1.3mk is probably not efficient and will not sound as loud as my GF's Dynaudio DM 2-10 or my JBL S-38.
And thus you may want to get the 372 or its replacement 375 to make your Dynaudio Contour 1.3mk sounds good at any listening level.
I talked to Dynaudio and they recommended me the NAD 372 for my GF's Dynaudio DM 2-10 and indeed they sound great together.
If you have more $$$, by all means, get a better amp.
My preferences for Dynaudio speakers are either NAD (low-fi) or Sim Audio (real hi-fi)