My Long List of Amplifiers and My Personal Review of Each!


So I have been in a long journey looking to find the best amplifiers for my martin logan montis. As you know, the match between an amplifier and speakers has to be a good "marriage" and needs to be blend exquisitely. Right now, I think I might have found the best sounding amplifier for martin logan. I have gone through approximately 34-36 amplifiers in the past 12 months. Some of these are:

Bryston ST, SST, SST2 series
NAD M25
PARASOUND HALO
PARASOUND CLASSIC
KRELL TAS
KRELL KAV 500
KRELL CHORUS
ROTEL RMB 1095
CLASSE CT 5300
CLASSE CA 2200
CLASSE CA 5200
MCINTOSH MC 205
CARY AUDIO CINEMA 7
OUTLAW AUDIO 755
LEXICON RX7
PASS LABS XA 30.8
BUTLER AUDIO 5150
ATI SIGNATURE SERIES 6005

With all that said, the amplifiers I mentioned above are the ones that in my opinion are worth mentioning. To make a long story short, there is NO 5 CHANNEL POWER AMP that sounds as good as a 3ch and 2ch amplifier combination. i have done both experiments and the truth is that YOU DO lose details and more channel separation,etc when you select a 5 channel power amplifier of any manufacturer.
My recollection of what each amp sounded like is as follows:

ATI SIGNATURE SERIES 6005 (great power and amazing soundstage. Very low noise floor, BUT this amplifiers NEEDS TO BE cranked up in order to fully enjoy it. If you like listening at low volume levels or somewhat moderate, you are wasting your time here. This amp won’t sound any different than many other brands out there at this volume. The bass is great, good highs although they are a bit bright for my taste)

NAD M25 (very smooth, powerful, but somewhat thin sounding as far as bass goes)
Bryston sst2(detailed, good soundstage, good power, but can be a little forward with certain speakers which could make them ear fatiguing at loud volumes)

Krell (fast sounding, nice bass attack, nice highs, but some detail does get lost with certain speakers)

rotel (good amp for the money, but too bright in my opinion)

cary audio (good sound overall, very musical, but it didn’t have enough oomph)

parasound halo (good detail, great bass, but it still holds back some background detail that i can hear in others)

lexicon (very laid back and smooth. huge power, but if you like more detail or crisper highs, this amp will disappoint you)

McIntosh mc205 (probably the worst multichannel amp given its price point. it was too thin sounding, had detail but lacked bass.

butler audio (good amplifier. very warm and smooth sweet sounding. i think for the money, this is a better amp than the parasound a51)

pass labs (very VERY musical with excellent bass control. You can listen to this for hours and hours without getting ear fatigue. however, it DOES NOT do well in home theater applications if all you have is a 2 channel set up for movies. The midrange gets somewhat "muddy" or very weak sounding that you find yourself trying to turn it up.

classe audio (best amplifier for multi channel applications. i simply COULDNT FIND a better multi channel amplifier PERIOD. IT has amazing smoothness, amazing power and good bass control although i would say krell has much better bass control)

Update: The reviews above were done in January 2015. Below is my newest update as of October 2016:



PS AUDIO BHK 300 MONOBLOCKS: Amazing amps. Tons of detail and really amazing midrange. the bass is amazing too, but the one thing i will say is that those of you with speakers efficiency of 87db and below you will not have all the "loudness" that you may want from time to time. These amps go into protection mode when using a speaker such as the Salon, but only at very loud levels. Maybe 97db and above. If you don’t listen to extreme crazy levels, these amps will please you in every way.

Plinius Odeon 7 channel amp: This is THE BEST multichannel amp i have ever owned. Far , but FAR SUPERIOR to any other multichannel amp i have owned. In my opinion it destroyed all of the multichannel amps i mentioned above and below. The Odeon is an amp that is in a different tier group and it is in a league of its own. Amazing bass, treble and it made my center channel sound more articulate than ever before. The voices where never scrambled with the action scenes. It just separated everything very nicely.

Theta Dreadnaught D: Good detailed amp. Looks very elegant, has a pleasant sound, but i found it a tad too bright for my taste. I thought it was also somewhat "thin" sounding lacking body to the music. could be that it is because it is class d?

Krell Duo 300: Good amp. Nice and detailed with enough power to handle most speakers out there. I found that it does have a very nice "3d" sound through my electrostatics. Nothing to fault here on this amp.
Mark Levinson 532H: Great 2 channel amp. Lots of detail, amazing midrange which is what Mark Levinson is known for. It sounds very holographic and will please those of you looking for more detail and a better midrange. As far as bass, it is there, but it is not going to give you the slam of a pass labs 350.5 or JC1s for example. It is great for those that appreciate classical music, instrumental, etc, but not those of you who love tons of deep bass.

 It is articulate sounding too
Krell 7200: Plenty of detail and enough power for most people. i found that my rear speakers contained more information after installed this amp. One thing that i hated is that you must use xlr cables with this amp or else you lose most of its sound performance when using RCA’s.

Krell 402e: Great amp. Very powerful and will handle any speaker you wish. Power is incredible and with great detail. That said, i didn’t get all the bass that most reviewers mentioned. I thought it was "ok" in regards to bass. It was there, but it didn’t slam me to my listening chair.

Bryston 4B3: Good amp with a complete sound. I think this amp is more laid back than the SST2 version. I think those of you who found the SST2 version of this amp a little too forward with your speakers will definitely benefit from this amp’s warmth. Bryston has gone towards the "warm" side in my opinion with their new SST3 series. As always, they are built like tanks. I wouldn’t call this amp tube-like, but rather closer to what the classe audio delta 2 series sound like which is on the warm side of things.

Parasound JC1s: Good powerful amps. Amazing low end punch (far superior bass than the 402e). This amp is the amp that i consider complete from top to bottom in regards to sound. Nothing is lacking other than perhaps a nicer chassis. Parasound needs to rework their external appearance when they introduce new amps. This amp would sell much more if it had a revised external appearance because the sound is a great bang for the money. It made my 800 Nautilus scream and slam. Again, amazing low end punch.

Simaudio W7: Good detailed amp. This amp reminds me a lot of the Mark Levinson 532h. Great detail and very articulate. I think this amp will go well with bookshelves that are ported in order to compensate for what it lacks when it comes to the bass. That doesn’t mean it has no bass, but when it is no Parasound JC1 either.
Pass labs 350.5: Wow, where do i begin? maybe my first time around with the xa30.8 wasn’t as special as it was with this monster 350.5. It is just SPECTACULAR sounding with my electrostatics. The bass was THE BEST BASS i have ever heard from ANY amp period. The only amp that comes close would be the jC1s. It made me check my settings to make sure the bass was not boosted and kept making my jaw drop each time i heard it. It totally destroyed the krell 402e in every regard. The krell sounded too "flat" when compared to this amp. This amp had amazing mirange with great detail up top. In my opinion, this amp is the best bang for the money. i loved this amp so much that i ended up buying the amp that follows below.

Pass labs 250.8: What can i say here. This is THE BEST STEREO AMP i have ever heard. This amp destroys all the amps i have listed above today to include the pass labs 350.5. It is a refined 350.5 amp. It has more 3d sound which is something the 350.5 lacked. It has a level of detail that i really have never experienced before and the bass was amazing as well. I really thought it was the most complete power amplifier i have ever heard HANDS DOWN. To me, this is a benchmark of an amplifier. This is the amp that others should be judged by. NOTHING is lacking and right now it is the #1 amplifier that i have ever owned.

My current amps are Mcintosh MC601s: i decided to give these 601s a try and they don’t disappoint. They have great detail, HUGE soundstage, MASSIVE power and great midrange/highs. The bass is great, but it is no pass labs 250.8 or 350.5. As far as looks, these are the best looking amps i have ever owned. No contest there. i gotta be honest with you all, i never bought mcintosh monos before because i wasn’t really "wowed" by the mc452, but it could have been also because at that time i was using a processor as a preamp which i no longer do. Today, i own the Mcintosh C1100 2 chassis tube preamp which sounds unbelievable. All the amps i just described above have been amps that i auditioned with the C1100 as a preamp. The MC601s sound great without a doubt, but i will say that if you are looking for THE BEST sound for the money, these would not be it. However, Mcintosh remains UNMATCHED when it comes to looks and also resale value. Every other amp above depreciates much faster than Mcintosh.

That said, my future purchase (when i can find a steal of a deal) will be the Pass labs 350.8. I am tempted to make a preliminary statement which is that i feel this amp could be THE BEST stereo amp under 30k dollars. Again, i will be able to say more and confirm once i own it. I hope this update can help you all in your buying decisions!


128x128jays_audio_lab

Showing 50 responses by daveyf

MSB Select 11 DAC is a superb DAC, when I first heard it I was surprised at how close it came to good analog. That was about five plus years ago! Times have changed, now there are DAC's that I think can compete, and maybe even better it. The Wadax, as mentioned, would be my first choice--if money was no object. 

BUT if you really want to go forward, IME the best source is still tape ( no contest) and then great analog, digital is still not at these levels. ( although getting very good, as in the MSB Select 11 and the Wadax etc).

@jays_audio_lab Aside from assuming that folks have not heard a top flite DAC like the MSB Select 2 or the Wadax ( which IME is even better!); one could assume that those very same folk who are suggesting that top end DAC’s are so great have never really heard what a top flite analog system sounds like --vinyl or tape. Personally, I do not think that top flite tape or vinyl even comes close to these DAC’s---it simply kills them!

Some good points in your video above. One thing about the cost of replacement drivers and their relative value to the speaker, while you correctly expose the issue that the Wilson’s and the Magico’s have, with the Wilson drivers being cheap and somewhat easy to replace, while the Magico drivers are expensive and difficult to replace ( with shipping and other factors increasing the price), I think you fail to discuss one other factor. That factor is how often is one likely to replace a driver. IMO, if you consider the number of speakers of any particular brand out there and then look at the frequency of how often the drivers need a replacement, I think you would see that this is not only infrequent, but years can accrue before a replacement is required. ( sure, if little lord Fauntleroy happens to stick his finger through a driver that can mandate more immediate replacement, but otherwise?)

Therefore, the cost to replace a driver should be amortized over the number of years that it will likely become a factor...and in this case we can see that the cost in all instances comes down considerably for all speakers ( even the Magico). So, is this really something that the consumer should be that concerned about?

 

Lastly, there is another variable that I think is well worth while considering, and it is this: to some folk, the ’ultra high end’ is still incredibly affordable. These folk make more than the cost of your entire system in less than an hour, and they do this constantly. To others ( the majority?), the cost of the ’ultra high end’ is so far out of their reach that it is not even feasible in their wildest dreams and with their current or future earning potential! Are the folks in my first example thinking they are getting ’ripped’ off--I doubt it, are the other folks  ( assuming they have somehow saved up to acquire any of this gear) thinking they have been ’ripped’ off....???🤨

 

@jays_audio_lab   While you may believe that your amps are neutral, this is probably far from the case. Through history, amps have improved and become more neutral, but I think when you get to hear the generation to come and then another generation after that, you will realize how very colored your current amps are. 

All gear is colored, it is just a matter of degree. 

@jays_audio_lab To your point that a blown driver can happen any time, that is correct. However, if we look at the number of speakers out there that have never had their drivers replaced, I am pretty certain that it would be a significant majority, perhaps even regardless of age! You blew a driver due to carelessness, but i do not think this is as common as you suppose. Your point about the cost of a driver is well taken given the examples you post, but IMO the odds of this happening are nowhere near as great as you may think. Unless, one is extremely careless!

I do question when was the last time that a consumer who would likely buy an expensive pair of speakers ( north of say $20K) would concern themselves about the cost of the materials to build the product. There are a lot of speakers on the market in that category that cost the manufactures less than a 1/5 of the asking price to build, and in some cases -- a lot less! ( BTW, this applies not just to speakers, but most high end audio gear, and as you correctly pointed out...cabling is another story entirely!)

I can personally think of a pair of speakers that are now retailing for slightly north of $90K that cost the manufacturer a little more than $2K to build....and that’s just off the top of my head!

Are you saying that owning Magico’s has a much higher cost of ownership than Wilson’s?

I think almost all audio gear has a cost of ownership, some pieces more than others. It’s is quite hard to name a piece of audio gear that increases in value over time, never mind keeps its value.

 

Your analogy of the Toyota to the Land Rover is an interesting one, again in high end audio, I think there is even more ’brand’ consciousness than in automobiles. Certainly with regard to certain products that are priced in the very upper end of the hobby, there is an assumption that reliability and ability is a factor...even though this may not be the case at all.

I always laugh at the example one of my experienced a’phile friends gave me a few years back, when he was shopping for a good DAC. Ended up with a Bryston BDA 3, which shocked all of his less knowledgable friends. They were surprised why he bought the lowly Bryston vs. the much more expensive Lampi that they all owned ( and which he could also easily afford). My friend wasn’t so enamored of the inner workings of the Lampi. In the ensuing shoot out that followed, how many of his friends do you think were still as enamored of their Lampi’s?? So yes, price isn’t always a determinant in this hobby as well....

Jay, agree this is probably not really the place for this turntable discussion.

 

@viber6 Nowhere do i say that the current Linn is the best available. Yes, it is a different beast than its predecessor’s and superior to all of them, BUT it is not the best available. At the price point, it probably is the best I have ever heard, but compared to a turntable like the Basis Transcendence ( which is the overall best I have heard) it has failings. ( albeit the Basis is several times the price). Also, if you believe in the Linn hierarchy, then the cartridge is fairly low down the pole in importance, below the table and the arm. The hierarchy being...the bearing of the table, then the power supply of the table, then the sub-chassis, then the arm and lastly the cartridge.

I dont know how many folks here believe that source is the most important thing in your system make up, but I am one that does.

whitecamaross, you may wish to re-state your opinion about all older SF speakers, unless that is you have heard them all! While I generally agree with you that SOME of the older models could sound a little recessed ( or laid back), there are many that were, and are, superb on all counts. A sample of this would be the great SFGH’s that I own and the well respected SF Extrema’s, among several others. Lumping all of the brands prior work into one bucket is not correct at all IMHO, and does a MAJOR disservice to the great work of Franco Serblin. Your new Il Cremonese is a good speaker, but they are certainly not the best to come out of Sonus Faber...not even close.
ricred1, hard to flip??  Why would you want to flip a great amp anyway? 
I don't think Rowlands are any harder to 'flip' than any other brand...and IME, actually easier than most! Naturally selling your gear depends on the price asked...lol.
OTOH, if you are stating that they are 'hard to flip' once you own them, due to how great they are, then yes...that I would agree with..;0)

I would think the first thing to acquire after the table...would be records, lots of records. Luckily there are still a great number of really good outlets to buy vinyl and now a lot of really excellent new albums in all genres. A good starting point would be some of the MoFi LP's addressed above, but one could also invest in the Tone Poet series that I think gives one an excellent intro to jazz. ( even the new Blue Note reissue series at a slightly lower price point should be on the radar).

IF you would consider a tube preamp...besides the ARC Ref10, I would suggest a listen to the new CAT Legend BPX...it might be an easy decision for you! 
A’phile friend of mine brought over some of the inexpensive Ching Cheng pc’s tonight. We listened to them against a number of other pc’s --from Zen Wave, Black Cat, Synergistic, Cardas, Nordost and Audience. Interestingly...the Ching Chengs were basically junk in my system. Resolution dropped like a stone, frequency extension was non-existent, imaging diffuse, plus it was quite obvious that these inexpensive cables were no different than the stock ones supplied by all manufacturers' to at least give you the ability to hook up power!
My friend left the Ching Chengs with me...to throw into the bin.
Even the entry level Cardas cables had it all over them..Moral of the story, at least in this case, is you get what you pay for.

@jays_audio_lab  Prefer DAC's? Digital has one thing over analog, convenience....no question. BUT, IMHO 'IF' you are really serious about getting the best sound in your system, you will invest in vinyl or tape, or both. 

Going into analog these days is an expensive proposition, particularly if you are just starting out, but if one has the funds for a top flite system, then both will reward you with a higher SQ than any other source.

Owning an amp that is impossible for one person to lift and move around easily is now a no no for me ( and yes, i do own such an amp). The idea of a 350 lb amp that needs a jack to be lifted, or moved around,IMHO is a dumb idea. While the amp may sound like heaven, the fact that it has this non-user friendly aspect is more than off-putting. I guess there are folks who won’t care about this, since the sharp edges that will slice your hands and the sheer weight that will break your back won’t be an issue for you with the hired help, BUT for everyone else???

@jays_audio_lab Don’t your XLF’s break down into several modules each weighing considerably less? Most speakers these days are able to be moved around a lot easier than some of these dead weight amps with sharp edges. Sure there are a few that cannot, like Magico’s as an example....but even these come with wheels.

I fail to see why one has to pay so much for the snazzy casing and other accoutrements that really add nothing to the SQ, but a lot to the cost and the weight. The D’Ag amps and the Boulder you mention are a very good example of this line of marketing.

@rbach, Like I said, don't like the post--press ignore.  Like I have you on ignore now.

Seems like no one has much love for CAT these days?? In a recent shoot out with BAT, the CAT combo was the easy winner. I suspect it would be against VAC as well!

@jafant Would be interesting to see a video of the original Wilson Wamm...The Watt 1 would be ok, but the Wamm better...:0)

@jays_audio_lab  Nice video. Couple of thoughts...are you using a dedicated line with your amps? If so, hopefully just one dedicated line ( at least 20 amps) for all gear. This is going to be a factor before one should replace the outlet. Secondly, making sure your power to the room is good is very important...just ask Mikey Fremer about this, as he went through a power upgrade to the street that was extremely important...as it always is! Replacing the power connectors at the street transformer ( and possibly the transformer itself) is also highly beneficial...( although costly, but at the top level, that is what we have to do). 

I also think if you have speakers in the room...like behind your screen, that these will absolutely impact you SQ. as they will play in harmony with your mains ( even if turned off!). 

The Furutech outlet is known to need extensive break-in, as you discuss, although why you heard such an initial upswing in SQ and then a step back is odd. I use an Oyaide R1, which has none of these issues and sounds fantastic, but it is at the end of a totally upgraded dedicated power supply. 

BTW, a friend who owns the Furutech NCF outlet says that you can do away with the CF cover plate and instead utilize a ceramic one, easily sourced at Home Depot for a fraction of the price...works as well, or even better! 

Many users have reported the same extensive break in period with the Furutech NCF outlet. Anyone have any thoughts as to why this would be the case? after all the outlet is simply passing through power and it is not having to form in any way.

I wonder if expectation bias has anything to do with the results? 
OTOH, I seriously doubt that Jay would be so influenced.

I’m not saying break in is not a thing. I am asking what in an outlet would require break in…anybody?

@jays_audio_lab If you are using more than one outlet and are not using a dedicated line, then you run the risk of ground loops ( or you are running more than one dedicated line..and the same thing applies!), which maybe is the reason you are hearing the results you are with the Nordost ground blocks. However, I think a better solution is to run a single dedicated line, like I stated above, and run a good power distributor off that line. Your mono blocks and other gear should have no issues with that. Are you even running a dedicated line(s)?

 

Four dedicated lines could be part of your issue. I would suggest that you get yourself a good power distributor ( if you haven’t already) and run all of your gear off that and from one of the dedicated lines ( hopefully one that is at least a 20amp line) and see what the results can be. As we stated ( viber 6 and I) cleaning up the supply to your room is also important.

Should be interesting to hear what the final result will be after the 500 hour (Yikes) break in procedure...

Churning/Burning through gear like a friend of mine…who is constantly unhappy with his stuff..and changes it every few weeks..a recipe for long term discontent. I feel sorry for anyone who does this in our hobby.

Holding gear for months?? That is no time at all. Some of the most experienced folk I know in this hobby have had their same gear for decades! They love the music, not the gear. I’m not saying that trying to go for the SOTA is requiring one to stick with gear for ages, BUT it sure helps to know when to get off the train, so to speak. That is unless you are never content/experienced enough to know when you have reached a plateau and that the next step up is unlikely in the near future. Contrary to what a lot of guys believe, I am not one that thinks that epiphany’s are likely every few weeks...or even months, in this hobby. It’s all small degrees with typically more steps backwards than forwards. This is NOT a popular opinion with most high end manufacturer’s, or reviewers ( for obvious reasons), but I discovered many years ago that the latest is not always the greatest in this hobby...and sometimes far from it. The mistakes can be costly to you, but not typically for the dealer..or the manufacturer. Churning through gear tells me that a clear and defined ( and reasonable) goal is not well defined in the hobbyist...leading to my prior post.

@jays_audio_lab I actually watched your video from start to finish! Did you not say " I never fall in love with any gear"? That’s fine, but it should be a goal of most hobbyists, at least IMHO, to actually know what they are trying to achieve in this hobby, and more importantly what is possible for their budget. I may have missed this part, but what is your goal from the hobby?

BTW, I think we would agree on most things with regards to audio reproduction...and I do agree with most of what you have pointed out in your videos. ( well at least the one’s that I have viewed...there seem to be so many, LOL).

 

@ron17 please do enlighten me.

 

@jays_audio_lab I think there are reviewers who do live with gear for years before putting pen to paper. Not that this necessarily imbues them with more knowledge and experience about the product, but it probably cannot hurt. HP was in fact notorious for keeping gear for years after it arrived at his abode…most times to the detriment of the manufacturer. Not saying this is a correct behavior pattern, but it does show that there are reviewers who have different protocols.
Living with components for just a few months and then moving on…seems to me to be a little self-defeating as a goal in this hobby, even if you are trying to gauge the worth of every product on the audio market, but that’s just IMHO.

You are absolutely correct, but hopefully you will come to a place that you are happy with…which seems like an elusive goal for you. This hobby has a fundamental problem…and that is we are all listening for something different!
The other issue, is also not well disclosed…and it is this…the difference between the sound of a ‘live’ unamplified instrument and the absolute portrayal of a ‘live’ event can never truly be attained. Therefore, the best we can hope for is an approximation of what we ‘hope’ the real event sounded like. In almost all instances, that is nothing more than a guess on our part.

I recently had an interesting couple of conversations with two very well known high end designers. I asked them both these questions…A) how did you come to design your gear in reference to what live musical event…and B) how often do you listen to live music…or the re-creation in the studio of music.

The answer from both of these folks was very very enlightening.

 

@psnyder149 I dont believe that any recent Linn LP12 requires constant ’tune ups’. The days of the Linn falling out of set up are long gone. If you have a model from even two decades ago; if set up correctly in the first place, the table will hold that set-up without issue. If you are having an issue with a more recent LP12, it is because the person who set it up is not doing something correctly...and that can hardly be laid at the LP12’s feet.

Today, the new bearing and the upgrades to the suspension plus the improvements to the power supplies are truly set it and forget it.

@viber6 Source first is imperative IMHO, but folks like to look elsewhere, as this is a lot easier to do as the new shiny object holds a lot of interest to neophyte a’philes.

@jays_audio_lab  while the presentation can be Larder(sic larger) than life, the big speaker can usually create a sense of scale better than the small speaker, so long as the listening room is large enough. This is, IME, the biggest and most desirable difference between sizes. Depending on one’s room size, the biggest speaker that can work in the space is a plus…but not always. Question is how much of that increase in SQ is worth the trade off ?

Excellent video about the 'negatives' of owning the XLF. I think all of your points are 100% correct. The new Alexx V is really a special speaker, and I would choose it in a minute over the XLF's. 

One of the things that can wear on you as time goes by is what I call the 'day to day usability' of your gear. Lifting an amp that weighs in at 200+ lbs, moving a 700+ lb speaker, adjusting a speaker that is so complex that it never gives you the feeling that it is 100% correct..and so on. I learned years ago that owning speakers that I cannot lift except with a fork lift is truly a major negative to the 'day to day' enjoyment of the speaker...regardless of its ability! Now if one has no choice in the market than this type of speaker in order to get the results...but these days that's really unlikely.

@jays_audio_lab Nice videos. I’m not sure anyone can come to conclusions based on the fact that there are a number of variables that still should be taken into consideration before generally claiming that ss is the winner, or tubes are the winner. Those variables are the synergy that the gear has with your speakers, the cabling ( which could favor one type of gear vs another) and many other aspects ( room, tube type etc).

You did mention that you do not know how KT150’s would sound, as an example. This is a very good point, as I believe that the results would probably sway a number of folks. VAC gear has a particular sound, some like, some not, same as your Gryphon gear. I think you can say this, in your room, with your set up, this is what a VAC tube system sounds like, and this is what a Gryphon/ Soolution set up sounds like, with the particular pieces of music that you chose..and nothing much more than that.

My point, a generalization about the sound of tube gear vs. ss gear at this level really cannot be had from your videos. What people prefer on the Youtube video and with their listening preference attached to your particular set-ups, then yes...a preference can be attained.

BTW, you mention a mix of Gryphon ss amps and the VAC preamp, I can easily see why that would sound very good...as IME tube preamps are usually where the ’goodness’ of tubes is at..vs tube amps ( if that makes sense). So, with the VAC preamp and the ss Gryphon amp you are probably getting the best of both worlds. Now, here’s something to try, use the Soolution 725 preamp and the VAC amps...;0)

Not surprising that you would prefer a VAC preamp and Gryphon amps vs. a Soolution preamp and VAC amps. Would be mind 'blowing' and nothing to do with blogging, unless you are determined to be a 'blogger'...LOL,

McIntosh seems to elicit various responses with a’philes...some love it, some hate it...BUT their vintage tube gear is still very well thought of, and IMO for very good reason.

Jay states that McIntosh could come out with a SOTA product if they wanted to, they have the chops to do so. Then he asks that all manufacturer’s work towards pushing the envelope, except he already gave a perfectly good reason why McIntosh should not be doing that, and in fact does not/ will not do that. Hmm.😃

Having heard both speakers, XLF vs Alexx V...I would take the Alexx V, all day. Albeit, it is now considerably more $$. 
@jays_audio_lab Your two posts above say it all. I have not read this ’ongoing’ thread entirely, but it would seem to me that there is a common aspect that a lot of folks in this hobby will not accept. That aspect is that there are a TON of folks who buy this gear with their eyes...and NOT their ears! This is one of the reasons that I believe that great sounding gear can sit on the dealers floor unsold while less able gear, but gear that is eye pleasing, will move!
How many folk here are really being honest with themselves and will admit that IF the gear doesn’t meet their idea of ’aesthetics’ ( IOW eye appeal) that they will NOT consider it regardless of its SQ credentials?
That is why you see folk who are so disingenuous that they will change their opinion of gear, once they know what it is and have seen the ’look’.Then we have folk who are also ’gear lovers’..and NOT music lovers, that is another issue...and lastly we have folk who are simply trying to impress their friends/family/neighbors...and how do they do that?- through price love...the higher the better! ( NOTHING to do with the gear’s ability!).
IMHO, this is all pretty pathetic...BUT it is the current norm. My 2 cents etc.,.....
@jays_audio_lab   Jay, remember that in this hobby a large increase in amount spent does not equate to an equal ratio of SQ return. Therefore, if one has to add a power cord to a piece and said power cord is about a third or more of the price of the electronics, that will in no way guarantee that the electronics will increase in SQ by over 30%! In most cases (maybe all) a increase in cost by as much as 90+% will buy one an increase in SQ by maybe 10-15%! Seems like this ratio holds throughout the pricing structure of this hobby..for whatever reason? 
I do realize that folks aren't necessarily willing to accept that fact! But there you have it.

Stromtank is a very nice piece, but you have to really be careful which model you pick. The model that was reviewed by S'phile and the model in Jay's video would not be great for powering almost all larger ss amps. 

@jays_audio_lab   Are you able to sell Artesania to the West Coast? There is a (ahem---:0)) Artesania dealer on the West Coast.

IME, you have to be very careful with power conditioners and power strips. Power conditioners in particular. If you have a decent dedicated 20 or 30 amp line, many times ( most) a strip or conditioner is going to limit the ability of the amp. I have tried numerous power conditioners, many with supposedly the ability to support large amps...well IME that just is not so!  
My amp manufacturer ( Jeff Rowland) says no power conditioners, and with his amps, he is spot on. 
IMO, dedicated lines are the way to go, BUT you need to not only upgrade the line, but also the panel and the wiring to the street transformer, along with getting the transformer checked for connections. This is what i did and the results were pretty startling. The cost is going to be higher than any power conditioner, but I think the results speak for themselves.

@jays_audio_lab    So, you finally got around to buying either a great R to R machine, or a nice turntable...it was only going to be a question of time, LOL.

@jays_audio_lab You mention an interesting phenomenon that I think actually effects all a’philes...to a greater or lesser extent. Why is it that on some days our perception of what we are hearing changes for the better...or worse? Coming from the pro audio world, we know that listener/aural fatigue is a huge factor. So much so, that if we are fatigued after a long flight or whatever, we should not play an instrument. As a’philes, many of us listen for hours on end, leading to aural fatigue. I have noticed this phenomenon myself, because while the system might be superb, even the best systems cannot make up for this factor. Therefore, it probably is not the system at fault, but it is your ability to concentrate and hear/decipher the music...after time. Happens to all of us. ( even those who don’t believe this!)
I guess I really have a hard time listening to computer ( or headphones) speakers and making any kind of judgement when it comes to audio systems. YT videos are a data point to me, but nothing else. I have heard what seems like a good sound on YT videos and then listened live and come away with a totally different impression. 
 @jays_audio_lab   What do you mean by 'sanitize' the high freq's? I presume you are talking about a reduction in high freq hash? 

@jays_audio_lab  Your top pick doesn't surprise me a bit. This manufacturer has been getting great show results for years. 

Interesting points about Jeff Rowland. I agree 100% that the class D models are not his best efforts ( even though he may think so). The model 8 and 9 were where Jeff hit it out of the park, and where, I believe, he should go back to..Class AB. 

To this day, I very very rarely hear a ss amp that can better my JR model 8T that Jeff modded...after all of these years! Even today, if you look inside the model 8 (or 9) you are astounded by the build quality and parts.

Nice video Jay. I have been in this hobby for four decades ( yes, that dates me a tad) and what you state about various companies pricing structure has been a constant factor. Nonetheless, where i do think you may have over simplified the situation a little is in reference to the CH amp and its inability ( supposed) to drive the bass of the new Wilson Alexx V's. While this may indeed be a factor for this amp, it might be instructive to note that the new Wilson Alexx V is a speaker that is in some ways highly flawed!! Why, because the new Wilson Alexx V basically presents a dead short to any amplifier due to its ridiculous impedance characteristics! This is not the amp manufacturer's fault, instead IMO it is the speaker manufacturer's design flaw! Who on earth designs a speaker that can ONLY be driven by a huge steam engine type amp?? Well, the answer is: Wilson!! Now we haven't even discussed the price that is asked for the new Wilson Alexx V...which is ONLY $135K! That up from the prior model Alexx of around $105K..and for what benefits?? ( a deeper inability to be driven by any amp!) 

In conclusion, i would think the answer to anyone looking at whether or not they are being 'ripped off' by these unscrupulous folks is simple...VOTE with your wallet!! If all of us would do this ( or a majority would do so), I would strongly suspect that the behavior that leads to the 'rip off' mentality that so many of these folk have- would get modified. Until that time...is there really any point to your excellent video above??